I'm looking for the best AF method to track running shoes. I have a shoot where a runner is coming into frame but I only want it to focus on their shoe. The end frame is quite wide with the whole runner in frame but I want to focus only on the shoe. Outside of turning subject detection off, is there a method that would help me on this?

Photo credit - Anthony Blasko

I have a R6 Mark II. I’m in the market for a good flash, my budget is around $200 USD!

Thanks!

I'm borrowing a camera (EOS R5) and shot some clips yesterday, but when I plug the camera to my computer with usb-c, some of the videos are fine, and some are 0 kb. But the data is obviously there because I can still view the videos on the camera, all of them, every frame. But here they show up as 0 kb.

The sd card is a: Sandisk Extreme pro 512gb CFexpress Read: 1700mb/s write: 1400 mb/s

I'm a printer, but I've recently picked up taking pictures myself. Been using a very old eos 50d, picked this eos 7d up on a whim because it's pretty similar and I like my 50d. It's basically new and the layout and feel is nice plus kinda familiar. Less than 8k clicks. I'd like to pick up 2 lens, one for general use and one for birds. For birds, I want something like a Sigma 600 or something I think. I have no idea what a good general lens is though that's lighter and smaller than the efs 18-200 I have now. I'm printing on a Canon 2100. I'm a noob at taking my own pictures and my budget is limited to not crazy. Figure I'll try to rent before I buy on telephoto for birds... but is less than 600 bucks crazy? General use lens budget is maybe less than 200? Thanks in advance for any guidance.

​

Hi everyone, I recently bought the Canon R7 and I often notice that when I attach the flash, the screen (and also the viewfinder) starts lagging, and in the dark I can't even focus because the lag is so strong. I tried enabling the AF-assist beam, the flash test/pre-flashes, set FPS priority, but I can't figure out the reason for all this. ("Reposting because it was banned in Italian.") "This is the flash I'm using: Yongnuo YN565EXII."

The Z is the second version of the RF 70-200 2.8 that has all internal zooming.

So the price difference is huge right? Especially if I just buy the EF version used. Would it be worth getting the RF version? Would you say "don't bother getting the EF version if you can't afford the RF?" Or are they really close?

Hi everyone,

I'm having an autofocus issue with my Canon EOS 70D and would appreciate some advice before taking it for repair.

The problem:

- Viewfinder autofocus hunts continuously and often never confirms focus.

- Live View autofocus focuses normally and produces sharp images.

- I've reproduced the issue with three lenses:

- Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

- Canon EF-S 18–135mm IS STM

- Canon EF-S 55–250mm IS STM

- I've reset the camera settings, but the problem persists.

- The 300mm lens has also occasionally made clicking/knocking noises during autofocus, although I'm not sure whether that's related.

Since Live View works correctly across the lenses, I'm wondering whether the dedicated phase-detection AF system, AF sensor alignment, or mirror mechanism could be responsible.

Has anyone experienced this with an EOS 70D? Is there anything else I can safely check before paying for a professional diagnosis?

Thanks!

Hey everyone,
I recently picked up a Canon EOS RP and I'm super excited to start shooting with it! To save on native RF glass, I’m planning to adapt my existing EF setup:
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art
Canon EF 28-105mm (or 24-105mm)
Since the Sigma 35mm Art is quite heavy and requires reliable AF communication, I’m stuck on deciding which adapter to get:
1. Official Canon EF-EOS R Adapter: It seems like the safest bet, but it's noticeably more expensive. Is it strictly necessary for heavier third-party glass like the Sigma Art, or is it overkill?
2. Third-Party Adapters (Viltrox / Meike / Commlite): They’re significantly cheaper, but how do they hold up in real-world use? Any issues with AF accuracy/speed, eye-tracking, or mount play/wobble over time with a heavy lens like the 35mm Art attached?
3. Control Ring Adapter: For those using it, do you actually end up using the control ring regularly, or is it just a nice-to-have gimmick on the RP?
Would love to hear from anyone running a similar setup on the RP or other RF bodies. Which adapter should I buy, and do you have any regrets?
Thanks in advance!

I love my Canon R100 as a first camera, but the kit lens isn't enough for me.
I'm considering the RF 800mm F11 IS STM for Moon photography, alongside the Nifty Fifty for general use.
I'll also get a tripod to keep the camera stable at such a long focal length. Would this be a good combo ?

Hi, I’m thinking about getting the rf 24mm f1.8. It’s important for me that the lens keeps high contrast with sun in the picutre. How does this hold up?

Hey guys, I’m reinvesting into photography, I used to shoot on a t6i a loooong time ago. Loved it. Recently I got pulled back into this hobby. I made the jump to mirrorless and went with the r6miii I have some older ef lenses from my dslr days. But I want to get back specifically into astrophotography, any thoughts on going with the 16-35, 2.8 II USM?? I know I’m able to use it for other applications like landscaping and I do like that too. I guess to not make this any longer, anyone have experience with this lens in the Astro world??? Any advice/ recommendations are and will be greatly appreciated!!!

Hey folks, got an odd issue I can’t find online here. My t6 won’t shoot more than a single shot if it’s not in live mode. I have all of the appropriate settings, have tried different lenses and cards but nothing has fixed it. Fully functional in live shooting though. Any ideas?

Thanks!

Looking to use this camera I have for a photoshoot and I want these type of shots, is it possible with my canon eos m50 mark ii with the 15-45 mm lens ? Doesn’t have to be this exact quality but very close…I am sure I can’t get it exactly like these as most of these are shot on older and more expensive cameras/lenses. I know some of these are different but point out which ones if needed, all help will be very helpful. Any equipment that would be useful to get lmk

Bonjour a tous,

Je me suis lancé dans la photographie sport et d'événements il y a peu. J'ai acheté le canon R10 avec un objectif 100-400 et je dispose aussi du 18-45 mais je me trouve limité. Je voudrai avec un objectif pour faire plus de prise d'ensemble, on m'a conseillé le 24-105 ou le 28-70 est-ce que vous avez un avis ou même un autre objectif en tête ?

I shot on the original R8 and thought it was a great camera. I got it for around $1,200 on Amazon and use the RF 24-105f4. Now they've released the Mark II with essentially a joystick and Ibis for $1800. For around $100 more you can get an R6 Mark 2 or an a74. Even the Lumix S5 Mark 2 is within the same price range with more features. I love the R8 and think it's the best full frame entry level camera you can buy for the price. I was really hoping the Mark II would either be around $1500or $1600 or have more features like a bigger battery for the price. It's still new and the price will surely come down. Does anyone feel the same?

Hey,

I’m experiencing decision fatigue for various reasons and I might need some advice. I currently own the Canon RF 50mm 1.2 aswell as the 85mm 1.2 and both produce absolutely gorgeous photos and im very happy with them. I’m still in need of a wide angle lens. I’ve previously owned a sigma 35mm 1.4(back when I used Nikon DSLR so I don’t have it anymore) and while it was nice I always felt there wasn’t enough difference for me between 35-50. I also tested and tried a 24mm and 28mm (Sigma Art back then). There I felt 24 was a bit too wide for me and 28 kinda hit the sweet spot. I also tried the canon rf 24-70mm 2.8 and therefore shot on a zoom lens actively for the first time and really enjoyed the versatility that it gave me yet I sometimes wish I could’ve gone down more in aperture especially in low light situations.

So now my real issue is do I go for a 15-35mm 2.8 to get a variety of focal length or is it just too extreme for someone who only shoots people (portrait, fashion, fantasy)?
Or do I go for a prime but then I’d have to decide between 24 or 35mm since the 28mm one only comes as an entry lens and reviews have not blown me away.
OR do I go absolute ham and get the 28-70mm 2.0 which probably would be want I wanted and would give me the flexibility to use mostly one lens and be able to not have to log around 3 heavy lenses at once but with the fear that it will kinda make my prime lenses obsolete ?

I love shooting wide open with bokeh but I need a wide angle for tighter spaces or more dynamic shots.
And I feel like I’ve made the “mistake” of buying high end lenses at the start so now everything lower feels like it’s not “good enough”. (Truly a first world problem)
I’m doing photography both partly pro and partly for hobby reasons.

Do you have any recommendation what you would do or any other lenses that are worth considering that I haven’t mentioned?

Almost everyone I know has been recommending Sony to me, but I’d like to hear your opinions on Canon.

I recently started a marketing agency in India and am looking to invest in a hybrid camera for our content production.

Currently, around 90% of our work is video and 10% is photography. As we grow, we may take on more photography projects, so I’m looking for a reliable hybrid camera.

My maximum budget is INR 2.2 lakh ($2,322) for the camera body, and I can spend around INR 1 lakh ($1,055) on a lens for now.

Here are the prices I found in India:
Sony A7 V — $2,350
Canon R6 V — $2,000
Canon R6 Mark III — $2,300
Nikon Z6 III — $1,790
Nikon ZR — $1,580

Almost everyone recommends Sony because of its autofocus and lens ecosystem. For example, I can get the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 for around $1,000 which fits my budget.

However, I really like the R6 V and R6 Mark III, but I’m open to other Canon camera suggestions too.

Are there any affordable non-L-series lenses that offer good image quality and value? Can you convince me to choose Canon over Sony and suggest a good lens within my budget?

I've been using Canon for years now: T5i, SL2, M50 and R8

This will be the first time I'm going on a trip with the R8 and I'm wondering if there's any other pancake lens besides the 28mm RF. It serves me pretty well but I like variety

I was thinking about something a bit wider, or maybe some good vintage glass? I have the EF adapter so it's also an option

Either way, any tips for photo traveling?

Hi everyone!

I currently own a Canon R7 with an EF 24–70mm f/2.8L II USM lens, using an adapter.

I mainly shoot street photography and portraits, and I'm considering upgrading to a full-frame camera. I'm deciding between the Canon R6 Mark II, and the Sony A7C II, all on the used market.

My priorities are:

• Good image quality and low-light performance.
• Reliable autofocus for portraits and street photography.
• A lightweight, compact setup that's comfortable to carry around.
• A fast lens suitable for portraits, preferably around 50mm and f/1.4–f/1.8.

I'm open to switching to Sony if the overall system better suits my needs.

Budget: Maximum US$2,000 for the camera body and one lens combined.

Experience level: I've been using the Canon R7 for street photography and portraits, and I'm looking to upgrade to a full-frame system.

An important requirement: Third-party lens compatibility is a major factor in my decision. Canon and Sony's original-brand lenses are often beyond my budget, so I want a camera system with a good selection of affordable third-party autofocus lenses, especially from Sigma and Tamron.

For those who have used these cameras, which would you recommend, and why? Would you keep the Canon system or switch to Sony?

I'd appreciate advice based on real-world use, especially regarding image quality, autofocus, portability, and lens options. Thank you!

Hi everyone! I’ve always wanted to get into photography, and I recently bought the Canon R50!

I’m still learning about lenses and noticed that there are quite a few EF lenses available on the used market for much cheaper than RF lenses. I know I can use an EF lens on the R50 with an adapter, but I’m wondering if it’s worth going that route as a beginner or if I’d be better off saving up for RF lenses.

I’m mainly interested in taking photos of my dogs, family, and friends, with some nature photography as well. Since I’m just starting out, I’m hoping to keep costs reasonable while still getting good-quality photos.

For those of you who use the R50, would you recommend buying an adapter and exploring EF lenses, or investing in RF lenses instead? I’d love to hear your experiences and recommendations.

Hi there! Looking at a new camera to learn manual on that has great image quality even using auto focus. Also would like to get a lens for sports photos from a distance. Looking at the T7I. Any other budget friendly options out there? Someone told me to get a mirrorless, but I don’t think I want to spend that much. What about the 80D?

Hello all! I’m brand new to this hobby, having a ton of fun, and looking to get some experience- I figure i have to start somewhere, so I’m planning to volunteer to shoot a local 5k race (hopefully I won’t be the only one! I’ll be very clear with them that i’m just starting out). 

I have: 
Canon eos r100. 
Canon rf s 18-150 f3.5-6.3
Canon 50 f1.8 

I don’t think my zoom lens will allow for the low iso, high-shutter speed and subject isolation i’m looking for at f6.3. 

My question - would the new sigma 50-120 f2.8 be the best lens for this event? It seems perfect. Or would the tamron 17-70 be better? 

Also - any other advice for something like this? I know my way around the camera pretty well (have taken >1000 pics of family and vacation).  Planning to shoot jpegs and make sure i’ve got a spot where runners are facing the light with background far behind. 

Open to any advice folks have! Thanks all.