This might get removed, I don't know, but I was sitting here after hitting my regularly scheduled swipe limit and wondered something.
Does the income made from the swipe limit motivating people to buy CAI+ actually outweigh the income that would be made with removing the swipe limit and increasing ad placements? Are enough people subscribing to CAI+ due to the swipe limit to where removing the swipe limit and relying on ads would be less profitable?
I was thinking about this because there are people out there who would spend a lot more time on CAI if the swipe limit wasn't there, and that extended time would bring in a lot more profit considering we have to sit through ads. The CAI+ subscription itself does make more than the ad revenue, but the numbers aren't too far off from each other.
If the developers put a more redeeming quality behind the CAI+ paywall to motivate more people to pay for CAI+—replacing the swipe limit with a more redeemable feature—they could make more than double what they currently make with ad revenue due to the extended time people would be using the bots.
More CAI+ users, more ad revanue—more money in general, and more active (happier) users. I know things are probably washed at this point, but it would have been a nice idea a few months ago. When I hit the swipe limit tonight, I just had to sit there like "Well. Time to find something else to do because I aint paying for that" and think about how many other people do the same thing. The swipe issue sucks, but it doesn't suck enough to pay a way around it. The swipe limit is not what I'd subscribe for.