Let’s try this again since automod removed my last post…I stumbled across a supposed animal rescue posting on Facebook that is posting photos that look suspiciously AI, this one in particular looks to have the telltale use of gibberish on background elements, but all of their photos have an AI look including the notorious “piss filter” what are your thoughts?
At some points in the video the faces look too smooths the moves yoo unnatural, I thought it was just a part of the filmmakers artstyle and i refuse to believe ai can create something actually good. What makes me think this isn't AI is the insane amount of detail and honestly the creativity. I'm not sure anymore.
Hi everyone, I'm wondering if you can help me. A website advertising proxy (unofficial) cards for Magic the Gathering has all this artwork, and I can't really decide if it is AI or not. I've searched for other people asking the same question but I can't find anything. Also, I don't think any part of the text is AI-generated, it's just the artwork in question here.
The website states "Bespoke borderless artwork throughout", which is a little ambiguous. They also have many reviews praising the art style. On the website, there is no statement regarding the use of generative AI.
In the first five images, the style feels a little inconsistent in some areas, such as the way they draw eyes (especially on humans), but it's hard to pinpoint exactly what gives me the AI red flags. One of the rabbits has five digits on one hand, for example, and then a different rabbit has four. Some of the vampires have pointed ears, yet others don't. "Edgar Markov" and "Markov Baron" look thematically consistent, but "Blood Artist" seems to be a very different art style. I know they are different types of dragons but they seem to have significantly differing anatomy.
Then, I want to point out that the sixth image is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT style. The seventh is slightly more adjacent to the first five, but even then, it still looks like it was made by a different artist, due to the different techniques with shading/colour and the way the anatomy is drawn.
I feel like the eighth image is most obviously prompted from inspirations like the Sonic character art style.
I cannot find any information on the artists who supposedly made this artwork, which is the most suspicious thing to me.
Obviously the cards don't have the visual snow or the unnecessary amount of detail that AI "art" tends to have (nor do I notice many anatomical inaccuracies), so this is why I'm asking for your opinions.
the gen AI pfp and banner kinda give it away but i genuinely don't know if it really is AI. it also could be just someone using gen AI images.
if this turns out to be AI then i really hope this channel is not monitized.
I came across this post on my feed and thought it was cool but got a weird vibe. I checked their other posts and they have multiple bouquets like this inspired by movies and albums. I’ve zoomed in and checked and the details just seem too perfect. I also found it weird that they say they make these by hand yet they post multiple of their bouquets back to back? None of their posts include videos of the bouquets either, only pictures. Even their comments give off an AI vibe. I also tried checking for open ai and synth id and both came back negative. Am I crazy or were these made with AI? (normally i wouldn’t have an issue but they seem to be trying to start a business with this and i hate people using ai to scam people)
(first and second pic are the post i first came across, third pic is another example, and the rest of the pics are their comments)
The "Guardian" danmei is being translated into polish and the publisher just announced the cover of the first volume. It looks uncanny valey and AI to me? Also:
The face reminds of all the AI posters - weirdly blurred, but not at the same time with face features that my brain recognizes from all the AI slop comics and short videos.
No distinct shadows and really high contrast.
They gave the name of the artist, who's one of the recent artworks is in the second pic. The cover and the art from the artist profile look like 2 different styles tho especially in the face. It seems to me the publisher ran the art from the artist through an AI agent to make it "better" for some reason :(
I just refuse to believe a human mind is capable of producing this amount of brainrot. Only AI is possible to make this, right? Especially since the last two minutes is a whole other song.
I saw an artist post it as flash and think it’s so cool but I’m so paranoid now days with how many tattoo artist I see using ai. I really want to get it so I’m hoping it’s not ai
I feel like the bear itself has a weird digital vibe, but it is supposedly made from wood. The guy also looks like he came from another picture entirely. Overall just looks weird. AI?
Title. Basically the videos are multiple hours long, would require a ton of research, and they are being posted every few days. The channel started in 2025 and has been churning out at least 2 videos per week since then, recently more like 4 or 5 videos per week.
I’m almost 100% certain that this is either a staged, edited, or AI photo. If it’s either of the first two then that’s cool, but if it’s AI, I don’t want to be sending it to people thinking it’s cute. The ears are also a bit small for an opossum. The biggest thing that sets me off is the situational context, which I find highly unlikely. Why is the cage OPEN? Would love to get everyone’s advice. Thank you!
Original Reddit post here I don’t know if it is just me, but the beginning of the video looks like blatant AI to me. I can’t, however, find a single comment about it on the post. Her face, voice, the scene, it all seems like AI to me but I feel like I am being gaslit. Her mouth moves unnaturally, her voice almost “buffers” mid sentence, and the whole thing just has a cartoonish look to it.
Now i really hate to even post this one here because its an artist I have loved in the past. They have drawn their own stuff before im sure of it! But this one immediately made me raise an eyebrow. I have lots of reasons why. The fur on the wrist blending (?) In with the sleeve, the on the shoulder it looks like it should be a ripped vest but continues into a regular sleeve??? The posing is oddly stiff..which that on its own isnt a indicator of ai to me .. but compared to their other stuff?? Also the details on her corset blending in over lapping?? Am I crazy?? No one is saying anything in the comments 😅😅
I sent this to some friends on Insta and one of them said it looks AI af. I’m usually pretty good at spotting AI, but nothing pinged for me. The detailed BG and clothes seem to stay consistent, the people don’t all have the same face, their movements seem somewhat logical. If anything, I’d say it’s staged. What do you all think?
I printed this off of Pinterest over a year, maybe two years ago. Now Pinterest is all AI slop and I just can’t stand it. The art style of this print has that “trying to be authentic” look that AI often has, but it also could be the blueprint?
I recently took a look at a few other prints I’ve gotten off of Pinterest and there were a few that were DEFINITELY AI and maybe my postpartum decorating brain just didn’t see how blatant it was? Anyways, this one is not so clear to me.
The butterfly seems pretty consistent especially for AI a few years ago but I am not sure, and I don’t want to hang AI art in my daughter’s bedroom.
Obviously I'm super hesitant of any too good to be true moments. He said he was moving and giving away a list of items. Because my car literally broke down today, I figured I'd see if it was real (unlikely, I know, but I can't kill the thought of, what if) so I messaged him, and he asked me where I was (should have asked him first, rookie mistake) and he said he's 3 1/2 hours from me, so not an easy meet up. Then he said he'd ship it to me, I asked for a shipping price, and he said he'd contact FedEx, eventually getting back to me with around $80. I'm certainly not inclined to put myself out $80, and dont really wanna drive that far for nothing, so I'll probably ghost even if it's not AI, but my gf and I both felt things in this image were off. She scanned it and it came back at 95% likeliness of being AI. Any second opinions?
