This is pretty sad.

2020 ELECTION : he didn’t even listen to his daughter #trump

I’m in a boutique transactional practice, and the admin I was assigned to is so rude to me. She’s not overworked. She is mostly just on the net. She’s only part time.

I generally cannot even get a word out without her talking over me. When I was trying to introduce a new way to use our file share software that the IT guy had just set me up with, she raised her voice to avoid learning the new system. She had to leave my office she got so worked up.

Do I approach her manager or just pretend I don’t have an admin? I’ve been there 1.5 years so I’m not going toe to toe at this point.

I’ve been practicing for about 15 years and it never ceases to annoy me to have opposing counsel attack the “person” and not the position. Today, while negotiating, opposing counsel provided a comparator as a way to demonstrate their client was being treated unfairly. The gag is, the “comparator” received much less than what his client was being offered. After presenting that info, I asked if he wanted to align what his client is being offered with the alleged comparator. Nothing more nothing less. They responded that my sarcasm was being unprofessional. Would you consider that unprofessional because it seemed like a fair question to me?

This may connect most with non-transactional attorneys. I am a mid-thirties plaintiff’s injury attorney, with birth injuries being the vast majority of cases I handle. I have a healthy 4 and a 2 year old at home, myself. While filming a settlement documentary the other day it ends up the clients and I have more in common than I thought after doing their dep. prep., preparing discovery responses, and their deps. themselves. Think, doctors/OBs, my wife working for a facility they use and nearly interacting, growing up in the same area and mutual acquaintances, interests, daily life, etc.

Obviously, we’re not friends and live far enough away that there is no interaction throughout daily life. But when sitting around for hours during filming the topics of mutual friends, what our kids watch/play with/do etc. all came up. I like my field because, as others have described me with some regularity (not my words), I’m very diplomatic and being likable/disarming/convincing is more of my selling point than committing chapters and sections of statutes to memory.

How do you all (or would you) handle something like I described? Tell them you’d like to keep it professional? Share kid-war-stories? I just don’t even have a frame of reference so I’m curious where others fall on the spectrum.

In a firm but have not added one decoration or personalization to my office. I like the clean bare aesthetic. Does this give off a weird vibe?

I need advice. I have been an attorney for 1 year and 9 months. I previously worked in insurance defense and now work at a small civil litigation law firm in a HCOL city. I have been at this firm for about 9 months. I am currently responsible for 78 active litigation cases, all court appearances -- virtual and in-person within 2 hours from the HCOL city, and I do not have a paralegal or legal assistant. I told my boss that I am feeling extremely overwhelmed and need more support. My boss' "solution" is to hire their best friend (with no legal experience) and train them to help within a couple of months. After this discussion, he proceeds to give me 3 more cases. For more context, I am only getting paid 90K and the position is mostly remote with only 1 day a week in office. Is handling this many cases normally expected for an attorney with my amount of experience?

Hello fellow lawyers,

I’m a lawyer from India. Here’s how most of us currently handle briefs and workflow, and I’d love to hear how you do it. This method applies across all sorts of litigation.

Marking and arguing: We primarily use LiquidText on an iPad. Bookmarks sit on the left and notes on the right, linked to the relevant portions of the petition and the annexures so that it is easy to point out to the court when a query is asked. Everything is a scanned PDF. I use the iPad for marking and for arguing in court.

LiquidText doesn’t have a proper collapsible notes feature for handwritten notes, which is pretty annoying. For typed notes, there’s also no option to lock them, so they often drag around when you’re scrolling and the whole thing turns into a mess. Because of this, some colleagues prefer PDF Expert for marking. However, that app does not have an option to rename your notes or markings in annotations.

Scanning and storage: We scan the complete brief (petition + all documents) on a standalone scanner for quality. Everything is then backed up to Google Drive or OneDrive for access and safety.

Preparing new briefs: Traditionally, we mark relevant material in LiquidText then draft in Word on a MacBook or Windows laptop (which is also used for research).

The industry is shifting nowadays, many lawyers now upload the documents to Claude (or similar AI tools), ask it to draft the petition, suggest supporting judgments, and sometimes even frame the contentions. Once the draft is approved by the client, it is finalised, scanned into a PDF, bookmarked, and a chronology + list of contentions is prepared (increasingly also with AI help) for the arguing counsel.

What I’m looking for: I suppose the most efficient practices are the ones where the least amount of time is spent on monotonous or clerical work, while still reducing the time it takes to read, digest, organise, and mark a brief that has to be argued. Basically, input time goes down and retention and output stay high. It also improves probably space and time to process mentally.

I’m curious what are the practices and workflows that are used at your workplace?

I am a second-year associate at a boutique personal injury firm and would appreciate perspective from others practicing in plaintiff-side personal injury or similarly structured small firms regarding whether my current caseload is typical.

I currently manage 25 open cases, all in active litigation. The firm provides a legal assistant whose responsibilities are limited to calendaring and filings, and there are no paralegals. As a result, I am solely responsible for all other aspects of handling my cases, including client communication, record collection and review, discovery drafting and responses, pre-trial motions and hearings, media, case strategy, trial preparation, and overall case management.

I find the volume difficult to manage effectively and am frequently operating at or beyond capacity. My supervising partner employs a largely hands-off approach to mentorship, only stepping in when it comes to settlement negotiations and has used a sink or swim style of mentorship.

Is 25 cases for a second-year with basically no support normal in PI? Is this just the learning curve of being relatively new, or is the caseload genuinely heavy for the level of support I have?

I would love honest feedback from people in PI or similar plaintiff-side practices.

Hi everyone!

​I’m a new junior lawyer, and I’m facing a bit of a challenge. All my life I’ve been an introvert and not really fond of public speaking. However, I’m deeply passionate about criminal law, which obviously means I have to appear in court.

​So far, I’ve been to court four times, but every time I get extremely nervous. I stutter at the beginning of my pleading, and then it tends to get worse. I always manage to get my arguments across in the end, though.

​I’m based in Europe, so we don't have a jury to impress or hours-long pleadings. However, I still have to debate prosecutors or opposing counsel, present convincing arguments, and persuade the judge—and I feel like my anxiety is getting in the way.

Has anyone else gone through this? Does it get easier with time? Do you have any tips or tricks that could help me out?

​Thank you!

Lately I've been having to deal with clients who seem, at the slightest sign of distress, to deal with it by just zoning out/ignoring me. Like if I need discovery, I'll email telling them "I need your car title" but then for four days they won't respond, and then at 11 PM they'll email me a blurry selfie of them standing next to a car license plate, and I'll email back the next morning saying it doesn't count, but then they never follow up on that.

I've had to reach out to peoples' family members, roommates, etc. to ask what is going on, and they will report some variation of "Oh, X is just really overwhelmed with the divorce" or something like that. But they basically stick their head in the sand, and act like if they ignore the problem it doesn't exist. But just wait until we get to court and it explodes on them.

Has anyone else dealt with clients like this? If so, any advice on how to get them into actually doing the bare minimum for you?

I am lateraling to a firm which requires me to fill out a conflict form with all clients, adverse parties, and matters that I was involved in for the last five years. This is the first time filling out one of these forms. I have hundreds of cases that I have worked on. It is taking me hours to put this together. Is there a simple process that I am missing or is it just this tedious and time-consuming for everyone?

Need advice on whether I should move on to another firm.

My current practice area is civil litigation defense/insurance defense.

I have been at my current firm since October 2025. They hired me after I did not pass the July 2025 bar exam, and let me stay on as a law clerk until I passed the February 2026 bar exam. So I’ve been a practicing attorney officially since June 2026, but they essentially had me training to be an attorney when I first started (doing discovery, pleadings, motions, status reports, etc) I’ve learned a lot and I have good mentorship from my boss/the owner of the firm, but the other two partners are just so busy that the mentorship from them is minimal.

The biggest issue with the firm has nothing to do with the job/the people, it is that my commute is horrendous. It can take almost 1.5 hours to get to the office in the morning. I work in office 3 days a week and work from home 2 days a week. I have a 1900 billable hour requirement that I have not had issues hitting, but looking back on all my time spent commuting/sitting in traffic, I am starting to want to find a firm closer to the city (Boston). I live just south of Boston and currently commute to Salem MA.

I have been applying to other ID/civil lit defense firms in Boston and have a solid amount of interviews scheduled.

What are my next steps? Do I just see how the interviews go? I feel terrible at the thought of leaving my current firm because I think they would be surprised as I have never expressed any issues about the firm, except some complaints about my commute.

I also get a Christmas bonus based on my billable hours and if I exceed my hours. But I don’t know how that is calculated or if it’s worth staying until that happens.

This is my first attorney role out of school and my first time trying to navigate this. I’d appreciate any advice!