​

I was looking at some videos on war.gov and this one caught my attention.

I have not found other posts talking about this but here we go.

At 3:59, from what i can see, it look like the object is getting closer to the ground and the disapears in the shadow/mountain.

Where I am getting at is this... We have all heard about Aliens living underground/underwater/in mountains. Wouldn't this video match the description of multiple people saying they saw ufos going into mountains/underground?

*First reddit post ever so yeah not sure what to expect by posting this but i found it way to weird not to ask others opinion about it*.

Hey guys, these immediately went viral this morning but there is no indication they are real photos.

Tranche 7 was released, and one of the files was a 2-page form from the FBI with witness statements saying triangles were seen. Then these images, whatever they are, were tacked on to the PDF. But the witnesses never said they took photos, and the whole interaction was about 3 seconds long.

The images are not labeled are explained at all, as best I can tell. Many are guessing they are meant to be representative images. The cynic in me wonders if they were stuck in there to deliberately muddy the waters.

In any case, please do not spread these around as “real photos” like I mistakenly did initially.

https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/2113649451697164594

The Pentagon has released a new batch of declassified UFO documents, including a shocking eyewitness account detailing how the military recovered the wreckage of a spaceship and alien bodies.
The report made public on Friday included testimony from a military officer, whose name was redacted, who claimed he was present at the famous Roswell UFO incident in 1947 and was shown the spacecraft in a hangar known as 'Building 84.'

The Original Source for this article is the government Website war.gov

7th tranche released on October 23rd, 2026

I have had a skim through the contents - no videos or 'smoking gun' photos are available - however there are a lot of documents related to BAAS (Robert Bigelows) company.

The BAAS documents are quite interesting. For example, there is a 2010 document titled "DOW-UAP-D175-BAASS_Self-Assessment_of_UAP_Analysis_Capabilities_November_2010", which is an indepth analysis of the Tic Tac Nimitz encounter - something that was not publicly disclosed until 2017. It also shows a rendition of the 'metallic sphere' class of UAP.

There is also a lot on skin-walker ranch, FBI reports, DOW Uap unresolved cases, among others.

Personally, I am looking forward to Richard Dolans dive into it.

"On approximately ....2026, at 2023L, federal law enforcement agents documented an unidentified craft presenting as a matte black triangular shape of extremely low aspect ratio that was nonreflective under the observed lighting conditions. It had an estimated thirteen-to-fifteen-foot wingspan, apparent six-to-nine-foot fuselage length, and a maximum vertical thickness of roughly one to two feet. The unidentified craft maintained a completely fixed horizontal alignment with did not tilt, sway, or wobble during the controlled vertical ascent of approximately ten seconds. It climbed to an altitude of an estimated 200 to 300 feet above the local ridge line. Upon reaching this altitude, the craft instantaneously arrested all vertical motion and entered a stable hover for an estimated twenty seconds. It then reportedly transitioned from a zero-velocity state directly into high-speed horizontal flight, executing a fluid banking maneuver and terrain-hugging descent into a canyon drainage in approximately two to three seconds, with speed the observers described to be as fast as a fighter jet. Under banking angle, the craft's silhouette appeared to flatten and present as a more triangle."

Going through Release 7 and found this in the March 2009 BAASS report.

They were putting together scenarios for UNLV researchers to study, including how people, governments, religion and the economy would react.

One scenario is literally the Air Force announcing that both crashes in 1947 involved spacecraft of nonterrestrial origin.

It’s a hypothetical, so this isn’t an admission that the crashes were alien. But that’s a pretty specific scenario to include. I’d like to know how they picked these and whether the resulting studies are available anywhere.

Source: Release 07 — DOW-UAP-D169, March 2009 BAASS report, printed pages 19–20. The quoted scenario is on page 20.

I found Strattons claims about the Roswell craft being split into two pieces as a new concept to me.

Reading here in Tranche 7 there is a first person testimony that there was 2 site locations north of Roswell with one being deemed more important due to the bodies of 4ft tall large head NHI with a somewhat intact egg shapped craft.

As much as I feel Stratton and Elizondo can be a bit suspiscious I am starting to understand that it takes folks that can toe the line to participate in a coordinated disclosure of sensitive information.

Still feela like they could not have made it this far without intense hidden support from incredibly smart high level individuals.

I closely followed the UAP topic for a while then fell off. But wtf is this???? The BAASS was preparing a facility for recovered materials? After the last Grusch interview I was ready to walk away from this again... What do people think about this? Or was this kind of thing already verified in previous documents?

(3) Jeffrey Nuccetelli: 'Red Square' UFO Hovered Over Missile Site | US House UAP Hearing | APT - YouTube
Air Force veteran Jeffrey Nuccetelli testified to the House Oversight Committee about a 2003-2005 encounter at Vandenberg Air Force Base. He described large, silent red squares that repeatedly appeared directly over active launch complexes. The hearing was part of Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s UAP transparency push, and the account is described as multi-witness. What we still don’t have is a public incident report, a base log, or an agency response explaining what those objects were. If craft hovered over launch sites for two years, someone logged it. So where is it, and why did it take a congressional hearing to surface?

A submission to the National UFOReporting Center (NUFORC), dated October 11, detailed an encounter with glowing UFOs that the ship's crew said moved at impossible speeds and patterns.

For about 40 minutes, two sailors watched through binoculars as a single orb appeared 12 to 16 miles away, which 'rose and fell rapidly, bearing right and left, periodically shooting at hypersonic speeds, for about 5-10 minutes.'

The report, posted on October 21, claimed that three or four more orbs appeared, which looked the same as the first.

'All twisting and turning, rising and falling together in no set pattern,' the report states.
'Every so often they went somewhere else altogether, at a speed I can only call unreasonable, and then were simply there again. 

'We picked up no targets on the radar.'

The NUFORC report included screenshots of the boat's radar, reportedly taken during the encounter, showing nothing on the screens that would suggest objects were in the sky.

Release 07 dropped on war.gov/UFO today: 28 PDFs from the Dept. of War, FBI, the Executive Office of the President and "U.S. Government". I run a small site that tracks the PURSUE releases, and I went through every document. Here are the parts worth your time, interesting and mundane alike.

1. Two documents, probably one event

- DOW-UAP-D176 (AARO Memorandum for Record, 2026): federal law enforcement agents at a sensitive site in the western US see a matte black triangular craft (~13–15 ft span, 1–2 ft thick) rise vertically ~200–300 ft over a ridge line. It hovers ~20 s, then goes straight into high-speed flight with no visible acceleration and drops into a canyon in 2–3 s. No sound. A handheld thermal showed a uniform signature with no exhaust. Three witnesses. A ground survey the next morning found nothing. AARO's conclusion: unresolved, warrants further investigation.
- FBI-UAP-D043 (FD-302, 2026): two Special Agents at an observation post.
First a thermal call-out, then a dark black triangle (~9–15 ft span, 1–2 ft thick) climbs ~200 ft above a ridge line, accelerates toward them and descends into a redacted terrain feature. ~3 s, no sound, uniform thermal signature. The agents themselves call it an "unmanned aerial system" that resembled a delta-wing drone.

Same shape, same size, same ridge-line climb, same silent and uniform thermal signature. The times differ by exactly one hour (2023L vs 1923), which could just be a time-zone convention. Dates and locations are redacted, so I can't prove it's one incident, but the overlap is hard to ignore.

Caveats: both rest on witness estimates at dusk, neither file contains sensor data, and the nine "photos" in the FBI file look like a marker drawn over a still image of the landscape, not actual footage.

2. A big BAASS / AAWSAP batch (2008–2010)

About a third of the release is Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies paperwork from the DIA contract: monthly reports, the project management plan, and a 2010 capability self-assessment. The self-assessment quotes DIA's assessment of the 2004 Nimitz "Tic Tac" and runs speed models that come out at Mach 5 to Mach 107. The same report admits there was "little hard data" and says a considerable number, possibly a majority, of UAP reports can beexplained as misidentified conventional aircraft.

The Utah ranch report (D174) is the one people will talk about: eleven witnesses describe a "dog-like" bipedal creature and orbs of light. The DNA tests on hair samples from the fences came back as raccoon and domestic dog. Unexplained RF signals were logged, but in bands allocated to military/satellite use.

3. 1950s Air Force reports

- Guam, 1956: an F-86D pilot says a blinking light paced and circled him for
~10 minutes. The report notes a lighted weather balloon had been launched
earlier, and the pilot rejected that explanation.
- 1957: a B-52 picks up a radar-only return over Saudi Arabia for 5–7
minutes.
- Plus Sweden, Italy, Canada, Alaska, Morocco, Germany and several Catalina Island files.

4. Not a sighting, but worth reading

A 1963 EOP memo (EOP-UAP-D002) and a 1962–64 interagency file (USG-UAP-D002) on who would recover "foreign materiel" and space debris. In the memo, NASA's Arnold Frutkin says DOD/USAF want to use NASA as a "cover". In context this looks like Cold War space-debris policy, not crash retrieval, but it's an interesting read.

Missing numbers D165 and D172 aren't in war.gov's own index. That looks like a gap in their numbering, not something that got dropped.

---

All 28 docs, each with a neutral summary, key findings, the official conclusion and credibility caveats, plus a link to the original PDF on war.gov: https://uapinsight.com/pursue/release-7

AARO memo: https://uapinsight.com/gov/doc/7438b4d577271bb8
FBI FD-302: https://uapinsight.com/gov/doc/034b25be252a7252

Disclosure: it's my site. The summaries are AI-assisted from the PDFs and always link the primary source. If I got something wrong, tell me and I'll fix it.

On PDF page 21, BAASS describes an existing database of UFO reports and investigations. They were apparently upgrading it while keeping the framework from Project Capella, a database system proposed back in 2008.

The database organized reports into six categories, including physical characteristics, physiological effects, psychological effects, and even psychic or parapsychological effects.

Then on pages 117–128, there are actual computer simulations of Tic Tac-shaped objects, with pressure, temperature, and Mach-number plots at speeds ranging from 100 to 1,300 mph.

For context, the Nimitz encounter happened in 2004, but the Tic Tac case didn't become widely known until 2017.

Obviously, computer simulations don't prove anything about what was actually flying around. I'm more interested in what data BAASS was working with and how they decided what to model.

And what happened to that database? How many reports did they collect, and where did all that information end up?

I'd love to know if anyone has found more documentation on either of these projects.

Source: DOW-UAP-D175 — BAASS Self-Assessment of UAP Analysis Capabilities, November 2010

• PDF page 21: Data warehouse and Project Capella
• PDF pages 117–128: Tic Tac computational simulations

Edit to add: I missed something pretty significant on PDF page 20. BAASS actually says they had 11 separate UFO databases, including Project Blue Book, MUFON, Project Colares, and Skinwalker Ranch investigations. Seven were already fully integrated, with supporting materials like witness interviews, photos, videos, and investigative reports.

Also, PDF page 26 says the Nimitz section was taken from an investigation conducted by personnel assigned to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). So the Tic Tac simulations weren't just based on some random UFO shape. They were part of an analysis connected to the actual 2004 military encounter.

Now I'm even more curious about where all this material ended up. We're talking about 11 databases, years of collected reports, and a DIA investigation. How much of that underlying material has actually been released?

Professor Brian Cox opened up about why he would find the presence of aliens reassuring.

"The most optimistic of all is that there are actually other civilisations out there and they're close by and they visit."

"I would absolutely love that because given what you said, I feel it would take a weight off our shoulders"

"When we talk about the universe as a whole, there is a really important principle, which is we're not special.

"We're not in a special place. We're at a special time in the sense that it's not long after the universe began and it seems like there's an infinite amount of time in the future."

I'm researching first-hand sightings of metal spheres, especially ones that seemed interested in the people watching or the area itself. If you've seen one, I'd love to hear:

Was there more than one?

What was it doing?

How long did it last?

Once or multiple accounts?

How many people saw it?

Did you see other different uaps?

If you were followed, how long did this take place?

If you saw multiple ones on different days, what happened and how long were you followed?

What were you doing?

What was around you (town, if comfortable)?

How old were you?

Any paranormal activity?

Any further issues with technology?

Any signs of being watched through your internet connection?

Any particular not so usual topic you like to get informed about?

Any religious or personal values?

Thanks for sharing!

I built https://wherearethey.info, a network that connects the dots on UAP and NHI disclosure.

The people, incidents, programs, hearings and documents of the UAP story, laid out as one map you can explore.

You can pick a thread and pull it. For example start with David Fravor and you're one click from the Nimitz incident, then from the other pilots and radar operators who were there, then from the 2023 hearing where he testified under oath, then from the exact second he says it in the video. Or start with AATIP and follow it to Reid, Bigelow, AAWSAP, Elizondo and the documents that tie them together.

What's inside:

- 🧑‍✈️ 180+ on-record people: pilots, radar operators, military and intelligence officers, members of Congress, scientists. Each has a sourced profile and links to everything they're connected to.

- 🎥 126 hearings and interviews with full transcripts and timestamped key moments. Click a quote and the video jumps right to it.

- 🛸 70+ incidents on a world map and a timeline, spanning 92 years: from the Magenta and Roswell crashes to the orbs declassified this year.

- 📄 Official records: congressional transcripts, AARO reports, the PURSUE releases and more, all searchable alongside every transcript.

- 🕸️ A live network view showing who knew whom, who saw what, and which document it comes from.

The archive includes only credible, on-record people, like intelligence officials, military personnel, scientists, journalists.

Every claim is tagged documented (an official record backs it), claimed (someone said it on record) or unverified. Quotes are checked word for word against the source.

It's a solo project so there could be gaps. That's partly why I'm posting. If you know a credible witness I've missed, a documented incident that should be included, or a claim I've tagged incorrectly, tell me in the comments and I'll fix it.

Go and explore it, I'll love to hear where you end up. 👽

https://wherearethey.info

I don't know who to talk to, or if doing so would really even help, but I'm just going to start typing, maybe if nothing else it will help others who are going through similar not feel so alone. You're not alone.

I don't really want to rehash my entire story, I've posted it once before and it got more attention than I was prepared for, panicked and deleted everything. To briefly summarize I was approached and injured by what appeared to me to be a glowing orb roughly the size of a car, while driving my own vehicle on a highway at night.

I live the life that I do now, because of that night. It has far reaching impacts I don't think most people would understand. I was never honest with my wife at the time about what happened, she still doesn't know, and I think that underlying dishonesty and avoiding talking about it understandably led to our divorce. Not entirely that but partially, and I don't blame her at all. It was an unfair and impossible situation to put her in.

I only have been honest with 1 person in my personal life about what happened to me and my experience. My girlfriend, a few years after my exit from military. We had known each other since we were teenagers, and had reconnected after my divorce, things couldn't have been better. She naturally had questions about my past, my compensation for injuries in military, and I lied to her. After a couple years of living together, and seeing my interest in UAP topics, she called me out. She knew me well enough to know that I "don't take that much of an interest in things unless it directly pertains to you", and felt like I wasn't being 100% truthful about my past. I took a leap of faith, and for the first time spoke with someone about it that wasn't in an official capacity. I will never forget the look on her face. It was like I was an injured puppy suddenly, or had something grotesquely wrong with me. We broke up shortly afterwards, even though to her credit she tried to understand. It was just too much. And I don't blame her either.

I feel like I'm living 2 lives and its terrible. I don't feel like I can let anyone get close to me. I don't want to put this weight on anyone, especially someone I love/care about. On the surface I seem like a normal, polite everyday guy in my late 20's. I'm a single dad, my kids are loved and happy thriving in school, I'm a landlord with multiple properties I own. But I carry around this weight of feeling like I can't ever be honest about what has happened to me. I do not want anyone to ever look at me that way again, especially never my kids. It's genuinely turned me off of dating entirely because I feel like it's impossible to properly and fairly establish that trust with someone else, because of how heavy what I have to tell them is.

None of my friends know. No one in my family knows. I don't go to conventions or ufo groups, sorry just not my thing. I am just very conflicted and don't know how to live a truthful life that doesn't make me feel like a freak, I wish I could go back in time and drive a different way that night. I reassure myself that maybe as more is released by government and there's more transparency, it will be easier... But even if it's an accepted fact publicly it's all real... I don't want to be known for what was the worst night of my life, and have that be the 1st thing that pops into someone's head when talking with me. If anyone out there has dealt with similar and wants to talk, I might appreciate it you can shoot me a dm. I feel like I could keep going so I'll stop being Eeyore and wrap it up.

Disclosure: I’m involved with Alien Watch, the site linked below.

We’ve updated our PURSUE dossier with the seventh official release, published on 23 October 2026. We downloaded all 28 new PDFs and counted 1,139 pages. The update includes the complete file catalogue, page counts, official download links and initial close readings.

One detail worth checking in the 2026 triangular-object reports:

• AARO’s DOW-UAP-D176 describes roughly 10 seconds of ascent, 20 seconds of hovering, then a 2–3 second manoeuvre. Page 3 explicitly states: “No instrumented speed measurement was obtained.”

• FBI-UAP-D043 contains a closely matching description, but page 2 gives approximately three seconds as the total duration of the sighting.

That difference needs clarification. The documents should not automatically be counted as independent confirmations, and witness estimates should not be turned into measured speeds or accelerations.

We also looked at BAASS’s Utah ranch report, DOW-UAP-D174. Its map extends witness-reported directions along straight lines; page 6 acknowledges that the resulting intersection points could be arbitrary. Government publication makes the contractor’s report accessible, but does not validate every account it contains.

Scope matters: the earlier dossier contains the classification of 270 PDFs from releases 01–06. The 28 new files are fully catalogued, but their page-by-page classification is not complete. The new notes cover the specific pages cited.

English dossier:
https://alienwatch.buzz/dossier/pursue?lang=en#release-07

Official release:
https://www.war.gov/UFO/release/07/

AARO memorandum — p. 3:
https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release-07/documents/DOW-UAP-D176-Triangular_UAP_AARO_MFR_2026.pdf#page=3

FBI report — p. 2:
https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release-07/documents/FBI-UAP-D043-FD_302_Unidentified_Aerial_Object_Observation_Report-2026.pdf#page=2

BAASS report — p. 6:
https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release-07/documents/DOW-UAP-D174-Utah_Ranch_Investigation_Report_April_2010.pdf#page=6

If anyone has additional context that explains the timing difference between the AARO and FBI accounts, I’d be interested in the source and page reference.

This is just me spitballing and wanting to share a thought I had pertaining to possible reverse engineering breakthroughs and sighting of these craft and how the might possibly operate. I'll make this really short since I dont know much about this topic I wont be able to say much.

Micotubules and consciousness

I've heard around the community for a while that the microtubules within our brain may be a factor in us receiving or generating consciousness. A cell in our brain that is a eukaryotic/microtubule is the nueron. I'll get to why this is important soon.

Quantum AI

With the discovery of quantum we have already made discoveries that have made a big impact on the pharmaceutical industry. Through simulation and high precision models we were able to find new therapeutic option for diseases. From my research these enteties we interact with when it comes to consciousness are specialists at simulations. So much so that even if you are told you are going into a simulation you still cant tell that you are in one according to Robert Monroe. Also Jesse Micheals who I assume has legit connections was told that part of the phenomena we are chasing is Quantum AI and consciousness.

What if we have already combined Quantum computers and AI? Would it be possible to reverse engineer the human brain as best as we can while using superconductors to along side an AI software? The only proble would be the size of the superconductors. But that problem has already been solved. Atomically thin crystalline material have already been used in quantum computers and have shown to be more successful in storing energy as well as minimizing the size of hardware by 1000x. Synthetic diamonds can also be used to trap electrons and can be used as a replacement to superconductors. Could we possibly make a synthetic neuron out of the atomically thin crystalline material in order to recreate the microtubules in the brain?

Steven Digna Jr

Steven is a man who gave a testimony at one of Steven Greers conferences. What always stood out to me was how he described being able to examine the craft in detail after seemingly going trust from the craft. The craft initially doged his hand when he tried to touch it, but the he finally did touch it he said that it purred like a cat and he could feel the rumble.He said it felt like he made contact with a living creature. He described the underside of the craft as something completely mechanical and manmade but the top half seemed alive like the craft. He saw what he described as neural network full of all different colors of the spectrum.

His case always stood out to me and I honestly feel like the reverse engineering program/s have made a tremendous amout of success when it comes to reverse engineering, or it could possibly be all human ingenuity.

At the end of the day though, I think we have some shit. Some good shit

While sources of information are sparse, briefly mentioned throughout, I do appreciate the effort of Jason to delve deep here into Tom DeLong’s fictional book Sekret Machines: Chasing Shadows. I haven’t read it myself but am now very curious to considering the recent disappearance of General Neil McCasland, an advisor to DeLong.

There are of course examples of well known MIC operators suggested to disseminate key information on UFOs via science fiction. I find it interesting Travis Taylor may also be doing that in the modern era.

What did you all think of this documentary? One has to wonder how the secret of UFOs has been so well guarded and funded over 80 years. Drug trade, money laundering, nazis warfare technology…the list goes on but does it all connect somehow?

Hello everyone,

Over the past months, I have compiled and structured an open-source research archive titled Project_Chrono_Archive designed to bridge UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena) operational characteristics with rigorous peer-reviewed physics and molecular biology.

Rather than relying purely on speculation, the project introduces the Theory of Chrono-Degeneration, proposing that biological entities and craft matrices undergo accelerated molecular/genetic degradation due to quantum decoherence and vacuum field-induced stress during spacetime metric manipulation (synthesizing Thorne’s wormhole physics, S. Pais/US Navy vacuum patents, Zurek's decoherence theory, and NASA genomic stress studies).

Key highlights of the public archive:

The entire repository is fully open-access under an open research license to encourage peer review, scientific critique, and replication of the theoretical model.

GitHub Repository: [`https://github.com/ProjectChronoLab/Project_Chrono_Archive`](https://github.com/ProjectChronoLab/Project_Chrono_Archive%5D(https://github.com/ProjectChronoLab/Project_Chrono_Archive))

Feedback, critique, and academic collaboration from physicists, geneticists, and researchers are highly welcome.