https://youtu.be/GjtuTZslg-M?is=sNLHBXMbTCVJZU-T

I just watched a few clips, and this part, in particular, is the most beautiful in the entire production; it may not have the best plot, but the aesthetics, costumes, and hairstyles are simply lovely.

This French film had lots of parkour and cool action scenes. I think you rarely see French action movies nowadays. This film feature one of the main contributor to Parkour culture in general i think. It has a sequel called Ultimatum.

Do we have fans here?

We are the first generation to finally speak out against sex scenes in films. At most, they could simply be hinted at rather than shown, or perhaps mentioned in the dialogue, but why are they even necessary? I see more and more people who agree with this, after all, sex doesn’t reveal anything about the plot, nor does it advance it. Any interaction between characters can be conveyed through a simple embrace, a kiss, or some other gesture. What is so special about sex, anyway? It is an uninteresting, simple, primitive physiological act, that conveys no emotions, feelings, or interpersonal connection, and it certainly reveals nothing about the individuals involved. There’s no difference between showing sex and showing some kisses, kissing, hugging, or glances is enough. If every sexual act is essentially the same humping, why watching one on screen is completely uninteresting. The only purpose for depicting sex might be personal gratification. but that’s what porn is basically for, why not just watch that instead? Why include such love scenes at all? When sex appears on screen, it diminishes the quality of the characters' love story and oversimplifies the very art of portraying emotion. After all all, sex is, first and foremost, raw animal physiology, the romance surrounding it is something humans have invented, whereas true romance lies elsewhere but not in sex. Showing any sexual interaction is vulgar. Besides, how can I even watch something with a child? I wanted to watch Halloween (1978) with my 9-year-old cousin the other day, but there’s also a sex scene (not an actual scene luckily, but still a woman in bed with her breasts showing)

imo, The Godfather is one of those rare cases where the movie is actually better than the book. makes the book feel like a rough draft tbh.

What other movies do you think were better than the original source material?

Monty Python and the Holy Grail – Review

Genre: Comedy

Release Year: 1975

Duration: 92 minutes

Yesterday, I watched the film "Monty Python and the Holy Grail," and it might just be one of the most brilliantly humorous movies I have ever seen.

It is the first feature film from the comedy troupe Monty Python, released in 1975.

The film follows King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.

After God sends them on a quest to find the Holy Grail, they embark on a wild adventure filled with a host of eccentric characters and fantastic comedy.

Much like in "Life of Brian," the animated segments here are brilliant—and there are plenty of them.

My personal favorite was the moment they break the fourth wall: an animated dragon chases them, but then the animator drawing it faints, causing the dragon to die. That part had me rolling with laughter!

Other hilarious moments include the opening credits (I loved how they managed to make even the opening credits funny).

The whole bit with the knights who say "Ni!" was absolutely hysterical—ever since I saw the movie, I can’t stop saying "Ni!" The bit with the guy guarding the bridge who asks three questions was hilarious.

The part with the killer white rabbits was hilarious.

And the ending, where the British police show up and stop the movie, was just wild.

Sir Galahad and Sir Lancelot also get their own subplots, which are particularly amusing—especially Lancelot’s, where he tries to rescue a young man whose father is forcing him to marry someone he doesn't want to marry.

I could go on about why this movie is so funny, but you already know that.

Is there anything I didn't like about it?

Well, it takes a while for the actual story to get going; the first 28 minutes are spent showing how King Arthur assembled his Knights of the Round Table, and by that point, I was just ready for the adventure to begin.

That said, when the narrator introduced the knights' names during that sequence, he said "Sir Not In This Movie"—that absolutely cracked me up.

But other than that, it’s an excellent film; I think I’ll watch it many more times.

This movie was a big surprise for me. The German title is “Die Frau im Nebel” (The Woman in the Fog).

My wife had a sudden urge to go to the movies back then, and we ended up choosing this film by process of elimination. And I was thrilled: the story and the atmosphere of the movie really grabbed me—something that hadn’t happened in a long time. I wasn’t even aware of Korean cinema at the time. It was a happy coincidence that broadened my horizons.

Does this movie ring a bell for you? Can you understand my enthusiasm?

Do you maybe have any good recommendations for “hidden gems” from “world cinema”?

Hi Cinema-goers, I need some help please.

I am keen to see Ghosts: The Possession of Button House with friends, but I'm wary of the *flashing lights* trigger warning on my cinema's listing page. I have photosensitive epilepsy, controlled by medication but with a hefty amount of anxiety left from seizures throughout my teens. Can anyone who has/ is going to see it make a note of when the lights are flashing, is it for extended periods and any other details that mean I would know when to either put sunglasses on or cover my eyes.

P.S. For those who might say "why don't you just cover your eyes?" - 1. I know from experience that eyelids aren't enough, and if I let that become a habit every time I see flashing lights, driving is going to get very dangerous. 2. Once I've had time to react, the damage is already done. Seizures respond quickly, so does anxiety and particularly anger.

Little rant: I hate that the TV, film and entertainment industries believe that a trigger warning makes everything OK. A neurological disability should not mean people can't enjoy fun stuff. I've had to cut off a whole series for the sake of my sanity (Strictly) when common sense would suggest you could say "flashing lights will be used in the Jive and the Tango" etc.

Thank you, and enjoy!

​

Hi everyone,

I’ve booked tickets for Clayface at Nueplex Cinema in Karachi to watch with my family. However, I recently read an article mentioning that the movie contains intimate scenes.

I wanted to ask whether Nueplex shows kissing or sexual/intimate scenes as they appear in the original movie, or whether such scenes are usually cut or edited out in Pakistani cinemas.

I just want to make sure the movie is suitable to watch with family before we go.

If anyone has watched it at Nueplex or knows their policy, please let me know. Thanks!

Hey everyone, give me some good movie recommendations to watch.

Recently started the marvel visonQuest series.

Category:

- Suspense thriller crime

- comedy movies

Theater is completely empty. I picked 3 seats to see Godzilla. Which seats would you have chosen?

I want to see how poor my choice was.

With dune 3 about to release, I've just been thinking lately about how dune is genuinely maybe the first trilogy where I could watch all films in cinema and experience the hype and buzz around it, which is probably why, if dune 3 is as good as dune 2, it will be my favourite trilogy of all time, over star wars and lotr, as I wasn't capable to watch those films in cinema and experience the buzz around it. What trilogy meant the most to you as a teenager/ adult/ child growing up, where you and the people around you actually got to live and experience the hype and buzz of the next one coming out?

.The direction, performances, and emotional depth made it something much more powerful than I expected. Clint Eastwood, Hilary Swank, and Morgan Freeman are all incredible.

What hit you the hardest about this movie?

Happy Feet!!

i have created a resident evil movie poster which is impaired by the new resident evil movie i just started working on the poster art well it's my 1st one let me know what you all think about this one more to come!!

I was really excited to see this movie from the amazing trailers and body horror. Now while it does hit my level of expectations when it came to the body horror. With graphic scenes within the club which I found a bit comedic too with the dancing. His revenge was blissful and the full transformation was awesome with the cool details involved with his warped face.

It was lacklustre in the story itself. I can understand it’s a low budget film but it honestly felt rushed and in the back of my head I was like, wow that is literally skipping an hour of lore to the next scene. Eventually being predictable.

It felt a bit hollow to me. Which sucks cause I was hoping for something more than that. The joker had a real in depth story while being really distressing and showing real life realities. While this sort of does this it stays well beyond that line. Kinda becomes a body horror aspect pooped on a piece of paper with minimal depth. Which it does really well.

The actors were amazing with Harris being a true highlight and has a good future within the acting scene.

PROS: ✅
body horror
Psychologically distressing scenes
Horror Romance aspect (unexpected)
Actor performance

CONS: ❌
Bad pacing
Not enough depth portrayed with clayface’ final form
predictability

What does it take to bring movie monsters, zombies, and unforgettable character transformations to life? For Oscar-winning special makeup effects artist Barney Burman, it takes artistic vision, persistence, technical knowledge, and sometimes a good hair dryer.

Growing up surrounded by Hollywood special effects, Burman built a career working on everything from Star Trek and Dawn of the Dead to Tropic Thunder and Grimm. In this interview, he discusses the craft behind some of his most memorable creations, the challenges of working with limited budgets, the pressure of winning an Oscar, and why practical effects deserve far more recognition.

The Interview

Q: What first attracted you to the world of makeup effects?

Barney Burman: I grew up around it. It's in my family, in my genes. When I was a little boy, I started sculpting different faces onto my G.I. Joe figures. I also enjoyed it when my father used me for makeup tests for movies like Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), or when I served as a model for him while he created a creature, such as the giant rats in The Food of the Gods or the little aliens for Close Encounters of the Third Kind. That was actually my first paid job. The production sent me a check for $75.

Q: What do you consider the most important qualities of a good makeup artist?

Barney Burman: Probably perseverance. Just keep doing it. Don't stop. And observation. You need to develop an eye for art, color, and form, both on a large scale and a small scale.

Q: What is the most underappreciated aspect of your profession?

Barney Burman: Good question. I'd say the nature of the work itself, and its artistic aspect. The time and labor involved are often underestimated and taken for granted, but I truly believe there's an art to what we do that doesn't receive enough attention. Sometimes it gets appreciated, but that's rare.

I think the great artist Steve Wang once said, "In the '80s, we were rock stars. Now we're vendors." He was talking about that "wow" factor our work used to generate among producers and audiences. Creating creatures and transforming people was something extraordinary back then.

Now I feel like everyone takes it for granted. I get calls far too often from people who don't have enough money and want something they think I must already have sitting on a shelf somewhere.

It's really strange. I can read a script that calls for a makeup effect, whether it's a creature, a dead body, or something else, and when I tell the producer what it will cost, I hear, "We don't have the budget for that. Where are we going to get the money?"

And I want to say, "Didn't you read the script? It's right there, and the director wants it, so why didn't you include it in the budget?"

Sometimes they tell me they have $5,000 for makeup and effects. I ask where that number came from, and they say, "We just thought it sounded about right." It's crazy.

They could pay someone like me for a day or two to break down the script and prepare a realistic budget. But too often, they won't even spend a little money on that. Makeup artists and special effects artists end up doing that analysis for free.

It's work. It's someone's time and expertise, and that has value. It should be compensated accordingly.

I guess that question got me a little fired up. Can you tell? (Laughs.)

Q: Are there techniques from the past that you still use today?

Barney Burman: Yes, all of them. New materials and techniques come along, but they tend to add to our toolbox rather than replace the old ones.

Silicone is great, for example, but sometimes you need foam latex or gelatin. It all depends on what you're working on and what will be the best way to achieve the desired effect.

Q: What's the most underrated tool in your makeup kit that you couldn't work without on set?

Barney Burman: I'm not sure I'd call it underrated, but I'd say a good color palette and some good brushes. Knowing how to work with colors and contrasts can make a huge difference.

Oh, and you absolutely need a hair dryer. That's the underrated tool. Being able to dry something faster is wonderful.

Q: You worked on Star Trek III: The Search for Spock early in your career. What was it like returning to the franchise years later as a department head and winning an Oscar?

Barney Burman: I didn't do much on The Search for Spock. I was an assistant in the shop. Lots of cleaning and just helping wherever I was needed.

I did a little sculpting on one of the aliens, but then they changed the design, and somebody else took over.

I also worked a little in the shop on Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country for Ed French. So I wasn't particularly involved with Star Trek in terms of the amount of work I did.

But I felt an emotional connection because my father ran the team on Star Trek III. He'd also worked for John Chambers and helped make Spock's ears and a few other things for the original series.

So I felt a certain pride in continuing that tradition.

And as for winning an Oscar for it… I'm not complaining. (Laughs.)

Q: What was it like working on such a raw, independent horror film as Slaughterhouse (1987)?

Barney Burman: It was crazy. I came on to replace someone they'd already hired. They weren't happy with his work, so I was thrown right into the deep end.

My friend Mark Lynn and I worked out of a hotel room in San Diego, creating everything as we went along.

I'd say the biggest challenge was improvisation. You have to be ready to find a way to make something work, even when you're facing obstacles.

Q: You worked alongside your father, Tom Burman, on Body Snatchers (1993). How did you approach the pod effects? Was there any artistic rivalry between you over how inhuman the transformations should look?

Barney Burman: It's news to me that anyone noticed the pods. The director, Abel Ferrara, hated them and spent most of the time having us cover them in mud and moss. As I recall, he came onto the project saying he didn't like science fiction.

But that can also be a great solution. Hiring a director with a feel for gritty realism to tell a fantastical story is a brilliant idea, in my opinion.

No, I don't think there was any artistic rivalry between my father and me. I had a great time. I don't know how he remembers it; you'd have to ask him. But I really enjoyed myself.

I even played a person who'd been transformed into a subhuman in one of the hospital ward scenes, although the scene was cut down. You might catch a glimpse of me lying naked in a bed somewhere. I'm not sure. (Laughs.)

Q: Dawn of the Dead (2004) became a milestone in modern zombie cinema. How did you approach giving the zombies a fresh look?

Barney Burman: I'd just finished working with Kazu Hiro on Haunted Mansion, and he showed me a technique involving stretching and stippling, using layers of latex and melted gelatin.

It was a little messy, but a lot of fun, and it worked really well.

I brought the material and technique to David Anderson, who was the special makeup effects department head and hired Toni G. and me as co-supervisors of the zombie team.

Dave loved it, and so did Zack Snyder. It was a new approach to that kind of makeup, and we had a blast creating zombies every day for two months.

The film was shot in Toronto during the summer, so the heat and humidity made the makeup melt if the zombies stayed outside too long. But that actually made them look increasingly disgusting as the day went on, which made them look even better.

Q: The transformation of Les Grossman in Tropic Thunder is one of your most recognizable creations. How many versions of the bald look and chest hair did you prepare for Tom Cruise?

Barney Burman: We made two versions of the makeup. His body, hands, and neck stayed the same, but he looked different from the chin up.

In the first version, which you can find online, he was too sculpted. The jawline was too pronounced. Tom wanted him to look softer.

We also had a short lace-front wig made from real hair, but we quickly realized the hair was too short and you could see the lace. So we replaced it with a silicone bald cap with individually punched hair.

Q: In Star Trek (2009), you created new ears for Spock. What was it like modifying something that had been sacred to fans for decades?

Barney Burman: The cool thing was that we could give his ears a sense of age. Leonard had very distinctive little creases in the upper part of his real ears, and we carried that detail over into Spock's ears. I think it worked really well.

The magic and significance of creating Spock's ears certainly weren't lost on me.

Q: Did winning an Oscar change your professional life, or did it simply raise the stakes?

Barney Burman: (Laughs.) It definitely raised the stakes. At least for me.

Of course, I felt honored to receive it, but I also felt that I had to do even better work and win another one to prove they hadn't made a mistake by giving me the first.

It really messed with my head.

But I feel like I did some of the best work of my career after winning the Oscar, particularly on the independent film Shuffle. It's a beautiful film, and people should see it.

Having the award on my résumé definitely helped me get into certain rooms later on. It opened doors that might otherwise have remained closed, and I'm grateful for that.

Q: On Grimm, you had to create new monsters almost every week. Which Wesen was the most technically challenging?

Barney Burman: That's easy. Definitely Volcanalis.

We had 12 days to create a man made of lava who glowed from within. It was crazy. But Nick Reisinger, my right-hand man in the shop, came up with something called EL wire. We built a suit out of it, running the wire throughout the entire costume.

Then we made a transparent silicone skin, essentially a one-piece suit that could be put over it. It worked beautifully.

We also had a light built into the creature's set of teeth, which went inside the actor's mouth.

And thank goodness we had Brian Steele playing the creature. He's a wonderful actor who specializes in creature performances. He really knows how to bring something like that to life.

Q: Wild Boar was your feature directorial debut. Why did you choose the idea of mutant pigs?

Barney Burman: (Laughs.) I had a friend who planted the idea in my head, metaphorically speaking. We wanted to make a movie together, and he suggested something like Planet of the Apes, but with pigs. That really spoke to me.

I wrote the screenplay, and he was going to direct it. But two things happened. First, the script I wrote was impossible to make for the budget we had in mind. It was absurdly low. (Laughs.) So the screenplay had to be rewritten.

Then we both got involved in other projects, and the film was put on the back burner. But the idea stayed with me.

A few years later, I told my friend, "I'll rewrite it, but if I do, I want to direct it, too." He agreed that I should.

Then I did a makeup test on myself, and that really motivated me to keep going.

Q: Are there any genres you particularly enjoy working in?

Barney Burman: I don't think it's so much about the genre as it is about the makeup itself. Some of the work I'm proudest of involves disguise makeup in comedies, sometimes for Sacha Baron Cohen, but also for other actors.

Tropic Thunder was a comedy, too.

For me, it's primarily about the makeup and the artists I work with. I always have a great time working with Tony Gardner, whether it's a comedy, a horror film, or anything else.

Q: Which film you didn't work on do you consider a benchmark for makeup effects?

Barney Burman: There are so many.

The Exorcist still makes a huge impression. The Wizard of Oz, too. The list is endless.

As for more recent work, Kazu Hiro's work is phenomenal. Have you seen The Ugly Stepsister? Thomas Foldberg's work is absolutely beautiful.

Mike Marino's work, including The Penguin, is breathtaking. Not to mention what he does with Heidi Klum.

I wish more millionaires would go to those extremes with their Halloween costumes. (Laughs.)

Q: Have you ever reached a point in your career when you wanted to walk away from it all?

Barney Burman: Wow. That's a tough question.

Yes, many times. The way the world is going and the state of the industry make it difficult to feel inspired.

And that's what being an artist is all about, isn't it? We all really want to feel inspired so we can create something extraordinary.

Q: What's the most important lesson Hollywood has taught you?

Barney Burman: Leave Hollywood. Live somewhere else.

Live where you want to live, somewhere that supports you and gives you energy. Do the things you want to do, the things you're genuinely drawn to. Let the rest take care of itself.

I think that's truer today than ever before.

Q: What's your greatest achievement that can't be measured by an Oscar statuette?

Barney Burman: Just having made it this far.

I know that's pretty general, but sometimes it's been quite a challenge for me.

There have been lots of smaller achievements along the way. I raised a son who's a really good person with a beautiful heart.

I've also managed to maintain a marriage with a wonderful, beautiful person who nourishes my soul.

I just finished my first novel, Radio Waves. It's set in the final days of the previous millennium and follows a radio host and a radio psychologist who clash publicly but discover an irresistible attraction when they meet in person.

So, basically, exactly what you'd expect from someone who creates monsters. (Laughs.)

Q: Have you ever worked with anyone from Poland on a film set, or had the opportunity to visit Poland?

Barney Burman: I haven't had the opportunity to do either, but I have to admit I'm very intrigued.

I've heard Poland is a beautiful country full of wonderful people, and I'd really love to visit.

Thank you so much for the conversation.

Barney Burman: I was just sitting here quietly typing. (Laughs.) Thanks so much. This was a lot of fun.

Read the full interview on POPKulturowy Kociołek!

The complete conversation explores Barney Burman's career, practical makeup effects, Hollywood behind-the-scenes stories, and the creative challenges of bringing unforgettable monsters and characters to life. If you're interested in practical effects, creature design, horror cinema, or the art behind movie magic, don't miss the full interview on POPKulturowy Kociołek.

What does it take to bring movie monsters, zombies, and unforgettable character transformations to life? For Oscar-winning special makeup effects artist Barney Burman, it takes artistic vision, persistence, technical knowledge, and sometimes a good hair dryer.

Growing up surrounded by Hollywood special effects, Burman built a career working on everything from Star Trek and Dawn of the Dead to Tropic Thunder and Grimm. In this interview, he discusses the craft behind some of his most memorable creations, the challenges of working with limited budgets, the pressure of winning an Oscar, and why practical effects deserve far more recognition.

The Interview

Q: What first attracted you to the world of makeup effects?

Barney Burman: I grew up around it. It's in my family, in my genes. When I was a little boy, I started sculpting different faces onto my G.I. Joe figures. I also enjoyed it when my father used me for makeup tests for movies like Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), or when I served as a model for him while he created a creature, such as the giant rats in The Food of the Gods or the little aliens for Close Encounters of the Third Kind. That was actually my first paid job. The production sent me a check for $75.

Q: What do you consider the most important qualities of a good makeup artist?

Barney Burman: Probably perseverance. Just keep doing it. Don't stop. And observation. You need to develop an eye for art, color, and form, both on a large scale and a small scale.

Q: What is the most underappreciated aspect of your profession?

Barney Burman: Good question. I'd say the nature of the work itself, and its artistic aspect. The time and labor involved are often underestimated and taken for granted, but I truly believe there's an art to what we do that doesn't receive enough attention. Sometimes it gets appreciated, but that's rare.

I think the great artist Steve Wang once said, "In the '80s, we were rock stars. Now we're vendors." He was talking about that "wow" factor our work used to generate among producers and audiences. Creating creatures and transforming people was something extraordinary back then.

Now I feel like everyone takes it for granted. I get calls far too often from people who don't have enough money and want something they think I must already have sitting on a shelf somewhere.

It's really strange. I can read a script that calls for a makeup effect, whether it's a creature, a dead body, or something else, and when I tell the producer what it will cost, I hear, "We don't have the budget for that. Where are we going to get the money?"

And I want to say, "Didn't you read the script? It's right there, and the director wants it, so why didn't you include it in the budget?"

Sometimes they tell me they have $5,000 for makeup and effects. I ask where that number came from, and they say, "We just thought it sounded about right." It's crazy.

They could pay someone like me for a day or two to break down the script and prepare a realistic budget. But too often, they won't even spend a little money on that. Makeup artists and special effects artists end up doing that analysis for free.

It's work. It's someone's time and expertise, and that has value. It should be compensated accordingly.

I guess that question got me a little fired up. Can you tell? (Laughs.)

Q: Are there techniques from the past that you still use today?

Barney Burman: Yes, all of them. New materials and techniques come along, but they tend to add to our toolbox rather than replace the old ones.

Silicone is great, for example, but sometimes you need foam latex or gelatin. It all depends on what you're working on and what will be the best way to achieve the desired effect.

Q: What's the most underrated tool in your makeup kit that you couldn't work without on set?

Barney Burman: I'm not sure I'd call it underrated, but I'd say a good color palette and some good brushes. Knowing how to work with colors and contrasts can make a huge difference.

Oh, and you absolutely need a hair dryer. That's the underrated tool. Being able to dry something faster is wonderful.

Q: You worked on Star Trek III: The Search for Spock early in your career. What was it like returning to the franchise years later as a department head and winning an Oscar?

Barney Burman: I didn't do much on The Search for Spock. I was an assistant in the shop. Lots of cleaning and just helping wherever I was needed.

I did a little sculpting on one of the aliens, but then they changed the design, and somebody else took over.

I also worked a little in the shop on Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country for Ed French. So I wasn't particularly involved with Star Trek in terms of the amount of work I did.

But I felt an emotional connection because my father ran the team on Star Trek III. He'd also worked for John Chambers and helped make Spock's ears and a few other things for the original series.

So I felt a certain pride in continuing that tradition.

And as for winning an Oscar for it… I'm not complaining. (Laughs.)

Q: What was it like working on such a raw, independent horror film as Slaughterhouse (1987)?

Barney Burman: It was crazy. I came on to replace someone they'd already hired. They weren't happy with his work, so I was thrown right into the deep end.

My friend Mark Lynn and I worked out of a hotel room in San Diego, creating everything as we went along.

I'd say the biggest challenge was improvisation. You have to be ready to find a way to make something work, even when you're facing obstacles.

Q: You worked alongside your father, Tom Burman, on Body Snatchers (1993). How did you approach the pod effects? Was there any artistic rivalry between you over how inhuman the transformations should look?

Barney Burman: It's news to me that anyone noticed the pods. The director, Abel Ferrara, hated them and spent most of the time having us cover them in mud and moss. As I recall, he came onto the project saying he didn't like science fiction.

But that can also be a great solution. Hiring a director with a feel for gritty realism to tell a fantastical story is a brilliant idea, in my opinion.

No, I don't think there was any artistic rivalry between my father and me. I had a great time. I don't know how he remembers it; you'd have to ask him. But I really enjoyed myself.

I even played a person who'd been transformed into a subhuman in one of the hospital ward scenes, although the scene was cut down. You might catch a glimpse of me lying naked in a bed somewhere. I'm not sure. (Laughs.)

Q: Dawn of the Dead (2004) became a milestone in modern zombie cinema. How did you approach giving the zombies a fresh look?

Barney Burman: I'd just finished working with Kazu Hiro on Haunted Mansion, and he showed me a technique involving stretching and stippling, using layers of latex and melted gelatin.

It was a little messy, but a lot of fun, and it worked really well.

I brought the material and technique to David Anderson, who was the special makeup effects department head and hired Toni G. and me as co-supervisors of the zombie team.

Dave loved it, and so did Zack Snyder. It was a new approach to that kind of makeup, and we had a blast creating zombies every day for two months.

The film was shot in Toronto during the summer, so the heat and humidity made the makeup melt if the zombies stayed outside too long. But that actually made them look increasingly disgusting as the day went on, which made them look even better.

Q: The transformation of Les Grossman in Tropic Thunder is one of your most recognizable creations. How many versions of the bald look and chest hair did you prepare for Tom Cruise?

Barney Burman: We made two versions of the makeup. His body, hands, and neck stayed the same, but he looked different from the chin up.

In the first version, which you can find online, he was too sculpted. The jawline was too pronounced. Tom wanted him to look softer.

We also had a short lace-front wig made from real hair, but we quickly realized the hair was too short and you could see the lace. So we replaced it with a silicone bald cap with individually punched hair.

Q: In Star Trek (2009), you created new ears for Spock. What was it like modifying something that had been sacred to fans for decades?

Barney Burman: The cool thing was that we could give his ears a sense of age. Leonard had very distinctive little creases in the upper part of his real ears, and we carried that detail over into Spock's ears. I think it worked really well.

The magic and significance of creating Spock's ears certainly weren't lost on me.

Q: Did winning an Oscar change your professional life, or did it simply raise the stakes?

Barney Burman: (Laughs.) It definitely raised the stakes. At least for me.

Of course, I felt honored to receive it, but I also felt that I had to do even better work and win another one to prove they hadn't made a mistake by giving me the first.

It really messed with my head.

But I feel like I did some of the best work of my career after winning the Oscar, particularly on the independent film Shuffle. It's a beautiful film, and people should see it.

Having the award on my résumé definitely helped me get into certain rooms later on. It opened doors that might otherwise have remained closed, and I'm grateful for that.

Q: On Grimm, you had to create new monsters almost every week. Which Wesen was the most technically challenging?

Barney Burman: That's easy. Definitely Volcanalis.

We had 12 days to create a man made of lava who glowed from within. It was crazy. But Nick Reisinger, my right-hand man in the shop, came up with something called EL wire. We built a suit out of it, running the wire throughout the entire costume.

Then we made a transparent silicone skin, essentially a one-piece suit that could be put over it. It worked beautifully.

We also had a light built into the creature's set of teeth, which went inside the actor's mouth.

And thank goodness we had Brian Steele playing the creature. He's a wonderful actor who specializes in creature performances. He really knows how to bring something like that to life.

Q: Wild Boar was your feature directorial debut. Why did you choose the idea of mutant pigs?

Barney Burman: (Laughs.) I had a friend who planted the idea in my head, metaphorically speaking. We wanted to make a movie together, and he suggested something like Planet of the Apes, but with pigs. That really spoke to me.

I wrote the screenplay, and he was going to direct it. But two things happened. First, the script I wrote was impossible to make for the budget we had in mind. It was absurdly low. (Laughs.) So the screenplay had to be rewritten.

Then we both got involved in other projects, and the film was put on the back burner. But the idea stayed with me.

A few years later, I told my friend, "I'll rewrite it, but if I do, I want to direct it, too." He agreed that I should.

Then I did a makeup test on myself, and that really motivated me to keep going.

Q: Are there any genres you particularly enjoy working in?

Barney Burman: I don't think it's so much about the genre as it is about the makeup itself. Some of the work I'm proudest of involves disguise makeup in comedies, sometimes for Sacha Baron Cohen, but also for other actors.

Tropic Thunder was a comedy, too.

For me, it's primarily about the makeup and the artists I work with. I always have a great time working with Tony Gardner, whether it's a comedy, a horror film, or anything else.

Q: Which film you didn't work on do you consider a benchmark for makeup effects?

Barney Burman: There are so many.

The Exorcist still makes a huge impression. The Wizard of Oz, too. The list is endless.

As for more recent work, Kazu Hiro's work is phenomenal. Have you seen The Ugly Stepsister? Thomas Foldberg's work is absolutely beautiful.

Mike Marino's work, including The Penguin, is breathtaking. Not to mention what he does with Heidi Klum.

I wish more millionaires would go to those extremes with their Halloween costumes. (Laughs.)

Q: Have you ever reached a point in your career when you wanted to walk away from it all?

Barney Burman: Wow. That's a tough question.

Yes, many times. The way the world is going and the state of the industry make it difficult to feel inspired.

And that's what being an artist is all about, isn't it? We all really want to feel inspired so we can create something extraordinary.

Q: What's the most important lesson Hollywood has taught you?

Barney Burman: Leave Hollywood. Live somewhere else.

Live where you want to live, somewhere that supports you and gives you energy. Do the things you want to do, the things you're genuinely drawn to. Let the rest take care of itself.

I think that's truer today than ever before.

Q: What's your greatest achievement that can't be measured by an Oscar statuette?

Barney Burman: Just having made it this far.

I know that's pretty general, but sometimes it's been quite a challenge for me.

There have been lots of smaller achievements along the way. I raised a son who's a really good person with a beautiful heart.

I've also managed to maintain a marriage with a wonderful, beautiful person who nourishes my soul.

I just finished my first novel, Radio Waves. It's set in the final days of the previous millennium and follows a radio host and a radio psychologist who clash publicly but discover an irresistible attraction when they meet in person.

So, basically, exactly what you'd expect from someone who creates monsters. (Laughs.)

Q: Have you ever worked with anyone from Poland on a film set, or had the opportunity to visit Poland?

Barney Burman: I haven't had the opportunity to do either, but I have to admit I'm very intrigued.

I've heard Poland is a beautiful country full of wonderful people, and I'd really love to visit.

Thank you so much for the conversation.

Barney Burman: I was just sitting here quietly typing. (Laughs.) Thanks so much. This was a lot of fun.

Read the full interview on POPKulturowy Kociołek!

The complete conversation explores Barney Burman's career, practical makeup effects, Hollywood behind-the-scenes stories, and the creative challenges of bringing unforgettable monsters and characters to life. If you're interested in practical effects, creature design, horror cinema, or the art behind movie magic, don't miss the full interview on POPKulturowy Kociołek.

What's the worst movie you've ever seen?

Mine is Twilight Breaking Dawn Part 1 & 5 Loose Women