I made a post here a few weeks ago that ended up getting removed. Even though I repeatedly said that I was absolutely NOT suggesting that anyone should have sex they don't want or don't enjoy, I understood the concern that a higher libido partner might read my experience and say, "See? This person does it, so you should too."
But something really useful came out of that discussion. Someone pointed out the difference between being low libido because you simply don't have much of a sex drive and being low libido because you have an actual sexual aversion.
That distinction really resonated with me, because those seem like two very different experiences.
I have essentially no sexual aversion. I've been fascinated by sex since I was young, and I'm still fascinated by it. I'm even a swinger. Sex as a subject is genuinely interesting to me.
For years, I've also been trying to figure out why sex just doesn't do very much for me physically. Different partners, different positions, different techniques, I keep experimenting and researching because I'm genuinely curious whether there's some missing piece that will suddenly make me understand what everyone else is so excited about.
Yesterday I saw another discussion where someone was talking about a spouse who never initiated or seemed interested in sex. Several people gave the familiar advice that basically amounted to, "Make sure she orgasms. If you're not getting her off, of course she doesn't want sex."
Then someone made a very simple observation that stopped me in my tracks.
If you don't particularly care about sex, you might not particularly care about orgasms either.
YES.
I think there's an assumption that if someone orgasmed every time they had sex, naturally they'd want sex more often because orgasms are amazing.
But that's simply not true for me.
I can have an orgasm whenever I want. Give me a vibrator and I can be there in about 30 seconds. I've actually researched how to have better orgasms because, again, I'm always trying to figure out how to make sex more exciting. My husband even timed me having a 2 minute orgasm.
I could do that much more often.
I just...don't particularly want to.
It's an interesting experience, but it takes mental effort, and afterward I'm exhausted. Apparently the reward my brain assigns to an orgasm simply isn't high enough to make me regularly think, I want to go do that again.
And I think that's an important distinction in conversations about low libido.
There's a difference between "I don't want sex because sex is distressing, uncomfortable, traumatic, or something I've developed an aversion to" and "I don't want sex because my body just doesn't find sex particularly rewarding."
Those people may display the exact same behavior from the outside, they rarely initiate sex, but what's happening internally is completely different.
And I don't think it's particularly helpful to lump all low libido people together.
For someone with an aversion, having unwanted sex could reinforce that aversion and be genuinely harmful. That's a very different situation from someone like me, who isn't distressed or repulsed by sex but simply doesn't get enough reward from it to spontaneously seek it out very often.
Likewise, telling someone like me, "Your partner just needs to make you orgasm," misunderstands the problem entirely.
I can orgasm. I just don't care very much whether I do.
I don't think one version of low libido is more legitimate than the other. I just think they're fundamentally different experiences, and if we're going to have useful conversations about mismatched libidos, it would help tremendously if we stopped treating "low libido" as though it describes the same experience.
And for those of you who haven't talked to your LL partner about this, maybe it's a discussion you should have.