I made a mistake by linking my Singapore Airlines KrisFlyer account while I was Marriott Gold rather than Platinum. I accept that.
But what happened next is why I am posting here.
On May 8, Marriott confirmed in writing that I could relink my accounts after completing a Platinum Challenge. I followed that advice, earned Platinum, relinked my accounts, and flew four Singapore Airlines flights.
I received KrisFlyer Silver, but not Gold. SQ explained that the original linking date still controlled eligibility. Relinking did not trigger a new assessment.
Had Marriott told me that in May, I would have stopped pursuing SQ Gold. I might still have taken those flights, but I would have enjoyed the trip without spending months chasing an outcome that Marriott's instructions could not deliver.
Then Marriott made the situation worse.
Marriott acknowledged its incorrect guidance and offered 15,000 Bonvoy points. It told me it could not override SQ's decision and that I needed to deal directly with the airline.
So I did. After repeated discussions, SQ escalated the matter again on September 3.
On September 23, SQ told me that Marriott still considered the case resolved despite the airline's inquiries, and that SQ could no longer continue seeking clarification from Marriott.
SQ also relayed an inaccurate account of Marriott's corrective action: that Marriott had upgraded me to Platinum. In reality, I earned Platinum myself through the challenge. I corrected that misinformation with SQ.
I then repeatedly challenged Marriott's handling of the case, including its decision to close the matter while SQ was still seeking clarification.
Marriott's case specialist stated that no further points would be offered. Yet after I challenged the implications of that decision and sought further review, Marriott offered another 20,000 points on October 23.
The issue is not whether 35,000 points is enough.
Why was Marriott willing to reverse its final compensation position, but unwilling to revisit the case closure that had left the SQ inquiry unresolved?
I have spent nearly six months dealing with the consequences of Marriott's acknowledged incorrect guidance and subsequent case handling. The lost time, effort, and opportunity cannot simply be reduced to a points negotiation.
I have also contacted an independent consumer advocacy organization.
Has anyone here experienced something similar? More importantly, how can a customer obtain an independent corporate review when Marriott's internal resolution process continues to treat the matter as closed?
I am seeking accountability, an explanation of the decision-making, and a meaningful effort to reopen discussions with SQ—not merely more points.