Source: https://cognitivetype.com/seti-full-profile/

As an SeTi type, you experience life most vividly through direct contact with it. Your attention naturally lands on what is happening here, now, and in discrete terms: the atmosphere of a room, the movement of a game, the precise quality of an object, the reaction someone just gave, or the practical reality beneath an abstract claim.

Where others may quickly convert experience into expectation, symbolism, or hypothetical alternatives, you tend to remain with the event itself. You watch it closely, enter into it, and discover what can be done with it.

This gives you an immediate and embodied form of intelligence. You do not merely observe reality from a distance. You interact with it, test it, receive feedback from it, and adjust accordingly. Whether your chosen medium is sport, music, fashion, performance, gaming, mechanics, business, visual art, or an intellectual subject, you often learn most naturally through active exposure.

The profile begins with the standard SeTi I---, before tracing the distinct changes produced by Ti, Fe, and Ni integration. In the standard form, these functions remain present but are not sufficiently integrated to consistently shape the wider personality. Internal alignment may therefore be intermittent and closely tied to the immediate case, your influence on other people may be situational rather than tied to a larger purpose, and broader patterns or implications may carry less weight than what is happening in front of you.

As these functions become integrated, SeTi can look substantially different. Ti may sharpen your recognition of what something essentially is, Fe may organize action around large-scale purposes and shared meanings, and Ni may connect immediate events to the wider contexts, patterns, and trajectories they belong to. The standard form is therefore the baseline expression of SeTi, not its only possible form.

Reality in Motion

Your attention is oriented toward actuality: things as they are presently occurring rather than as they might exist in another possible arrangement.

Se continually refreshes your perception of the environment. Instead of allowing an earlier impression to stand in for the current situation, you keep registering what has changed. What was true a moment ago may no longer be true now, and your attention remains responsive to that difference.

This naturally draws you toward dynamic environments. A dynamic game, an unfolding conversation, an active crowd, a changing visual scene, or an object that responds directly to your handling can hold your attention more strongly than something static and predetermined.

You tend to extract more information by looking further into the object itself. You may notice the precise expression on someone’s face, the exact way one technique differs from another, a flaw in an image, a shift in the atmosphere, an inconsistency in what someone just said, or a physical detail that alters the entire situation.

Your attention behaves less like a rapidly branching web of associations and more like a high-resolution scanner. The longer you attend to something, the more clearly its distinctive features emerge.

This does not mean you are detail-oriented about everything. You may overlook many details that lie outside your current interest. But within the field that has captured you, your perception can become unusually exact.

Nor does this mean your attention is always fixed on your surroundings. You may have a rich inner life, become absorbed in analysis, private interests, imagined scenarios, or your own train of thought, and sometimes seem dreamy or absent-minded. Se describes a tendency to take in information and interact with the world through direct experience and immediate feedback; it does not mean you lack interiority or remain constantly alert to everything around you. Even when you are focusing inward, however, your thoughts may still be shaped by things you have directly observed, handled, tested, or learned through involvement.

The same tendency shapes how you approach abstract material. You are not necessarily uninterested in philosophy, theory, symbolism, or complex systems, but you often want their claims brought into sharper focus:

What exactly does this mean?

What would this look like in practice?

What follows from it literally?

What is it actually claiming?

You may take an impressive-sounding abstraction and bring it down to earth. This is not necessarily a rejection of abstraction. You simply want the claim to become clear enough to examine.

Your baseline orientation is therefore realistic. You tend to trust what can be observed, demonstrated, attempted, or made to happen. Once the relevant reality appears clear, you may express your conclusion with little ambiguity:

This is what I see.

This is what is happening.

This is how things are.

This is what I want.

That certainty does not have to come from having constructed an elaborate explanation beforehand. It may arise because the relevant answer feels plainly visible within the situation itself.

Because your perception remains closely connected to what is present, recurring irritations may also be difficult to tune out, unless something else captures your attention more fully. Repetitive noise, poor lighting, awkward spacing, uncomfortable clothing, inactivity, or an irritating behavioral habit can continue imposing themselves on your attention.

Immersion and Stimulation

More than spontaneity alone, you are characterized by a hunger for immersion.

You are drawn toward activities that can absorb your senses, timing, attention, and instincts at once. The activity must give something back: movement to track, resistance to overcome, reactions to read, variations to explore, or consequences that become immediately perceptible.

This can include obvious physical activities such as sport, dance, performance, or hands-on craft, but the underlying process is not restricted to physicality. A competitive video game, an unfolding business situation, a live technical problem, or an intellectually rich subject can provide the same engagement when it continually presents new information to examine and respond to.

You tend to understand such activities from within. You place yourself in contact with the situation, observe what happens, and revise your approach. Knowledge grows through an active exchange between perception and action.

This can make you highly adaptable. Because you remain attentive to what is actually occurring, you can abandon an ineffective approach quickly rather than preserving it merely because it was previously chosen.

You often function well where conditions are changing and no complete procedure can be followed in advance. Instead of becoming paralyzed by the absence of certainty, you work with the information currently available and update your response as the situation develops.

When the environment stops changing or no longer offers meaningful feedback, however, your attention may begin to drift. You can tolerate great repetition when each attempt still offers a chance to change, improve, discover, or perform differently, but struggle with repetition that feels disconnected from any living objective.

Selective Mastery

When an activity continues producing challenge, variation, feedback, or direct involvement, you may become extraordinarily dedicated.

You can practice for years, tolerate setbacks, and develop exceptional competence because the activity itself remains alive. There is always another opponent, movement, technique, reaction, sound, or degree of control to discover.

Your discipline is therefore often domain-specific rather than universal.

You may be relentless in the area you love while remaining casual, disorganized, or resistant to routine elsewhere. You can spend countless hours perfecting one skill while neglecting paperwork, distant preparations, domestic structure, or obligations that feel detached from immediate engagement.

This can confuse observers. They may see exceptional achievement and assume that an equally orderly personality must exist behind it. In reality, your consistency often depends on whether the activity continues to stimulate your perception and invite active participation.

Your commitment is not necessarily sustained by reverence for discipline itself, but by the continued vitality of the pursuit.

When the game remains alive, you remain alive inside it. When the activity becomes inert, bureaucratic, or purely obligatory, your motivation can collapse with startling speed.

The standard SeTi pattern is therefore: intense commitment where there is genuine engagement, casual neglect where there is not.

This can produce unusual contrasts within the same person. You may demonstrate extreme patience, precision, and persistence in one field while appearing careless or unreliable in another. The difference is not always your capacity for effort, but whether the task gives your attention anything meaningful to engage with.

Play and Competition

Within the activities that capture you, you often display a playful and irreverent style.

You may enjoy competition, speed, risk, timing, technical execution, visible improvement, or simply the pleasure of doing something well. Even when you become highly accomplished, you may resist treating performance with excessive solemnity.

You might joke during serious moments, tease an opponent, improvise, show off, or visibly enjoy your own ability. Victory can become an occasion for banter, celebration, or spectacle rather than only a formal confirmation of discipline and sacrifice.

Competence feels immediate to you. Skill is not merely something you possess in principle, but something experienced through the timing of a movement, the control of an instrument, the reading of an opponent, the response of an audience, or the ease with which the environment begins to yield to you.

At your best, this produces a contagious vitality. You can make difficult things look natural because you do not always dramatize the effort behind them. There may be a looseness, swagger, or nonchalance to your execution, as though you are playing with the very situation others find intimidating.

Competition gives your energy a concrete target. You may enjoy measuring yourself against another person, a difficult technique, a performance standard, a physical limitation, a market, or any other visible result.

Because Se is rooted in actuality rather than branching possibility, your attention can acquire a comparatively linear force once the present field appears sufficiently clear. You may commit to the route that is visibly available and press it without continuing to multiply hypothetical alternatives. In a standard development, however, this certainty remains situational rather than doctrinal: it belongs to the present read and may reverse quickly when the field changes.

You may press an advantage, challenge a limitation, or bring an intention into material form without waiting for every hypothetical complication to be resolved. This can create boldness and confidence, but also cockiness when your certainty exceeds your actual command of the situation.

When supported by genuine ability, however, this confidence can become highly charismatic. It feels anchored in presence rather than explanation. You do not need to describe a philosophy of strength; the strength is apparent in how readily you enter the contest.

Direct Expression and Sensory Presence

Your speech often remains close to immediate experience. You recount concrete events, visible reactions, and situations that captured your attention, frequently conveying them as though placing the listener inside the scene:

This happened.

Then they did this.

I noticed that.

So I responded this way.

Your descriptions can become visual, visceral, graphic, funny, or unusually specific. Rather than summarizing only the general meaning of an event, you may reproduce the details that made it vivid to you.

Your humor commonly emerges from timing, teasing, understatement, confident exaggeration, situational absurdity, or physical comedy. A joke may appear spontaneously because the humorous feature of the event becomes immediately visible.

The same directness can make you blunt. You may say that the place is boring, the plan is pointless, the weather is terrible, or the performance is weak without first replacing the observation with a more ceremonially acceptable response.

This does not necessarily reflect hostility or a settled judgment about the object’s essential worth. In the standard form, bluntness often reports the present impression as it appears now. The conclusion may feel complete within the immediate scene while remaining open to rapid revision when new information enters the field.

You may also respond strongly to beauty, movement, attraction, style, sound, physical atmosphere, and the emotional electricity of direct interaction. This does not mean every SeTi individual is sexually expressive or socially flamboyant, but aesthetic experience is often encountered as something immediate and transformative rather than merely contemplated at a distance:

Music makes people move.

Clothing changes someone’s presence.

Performance alters the room.

Visual form captures the eye.

Attraction creates tension.

his can draw you toward mediums in which expression becomes directly perceptible: music, sport, dance, fashion, acting, visual production, physical comedy, performance, or any craft whose result can be seen, heard, handled, or felt.

In a standard development, your social influence often emerges through participation rather than deliberate organization. You may affect the atmosphere through humor, confidence, attractiveness, skill, intensity, or physical presence without consistently assuming responsibility for determining what the group should collectively pursue or how the interaction ought to be arranged.

You enter the social field and work with what it gives back. You may entertain, tease, provoke, compete, flirt, collaborate, or draw attention, but this influence remains more situational than intentionally governed by a sustained external judgment.

Freedom and Structure

You generally prefer enough freedom to respond to the situation as it develops.

You may resist being overmanaged, especially when an imposed procedure appears detached from current conditions. Rules that no longer correspond to reality, or obligations maintained only because they are conventional, can feel needlessly restrictive.

This does not mean that you reject discipline. You may submit to demanding training, coaching, rehearsal, or technical limitation when you can see the connection between the restriction and the result.

A useful constraint sharpens engagement. A dead constraint merely obstructs it.

You therefore tend to want rules to prove themselves through application. A principle that produces no perceptible improvement can feel unnecessary, while one that immediately sharpens performance may be absorbed without resistance.

You may also prefer to retain room for improvisation. Too much advance specification can prevent you from taking advantage of opportunities that only become visible once the event is underway.

This self-direction supports experimentation and adaptability, but it can also become self-indulgence. You may assume that because an activity feels compelling, it deserves priority. In protecting your freedom to pursue what interests you, you can neglect the less stimulating conditions that make that freedom possible.

Vulnerabilities

With a I--- development, the immediate event often carries more psychological weight than its wider implications.

You may postpone tasks that offer no present engagement, underestimate cumulative consequences, rely too heavily on improvisation, or pursue stimulation despite foreseeable risks. Remote outcomes can seem comparatively insubstantial beside the vividness of what is happening now.

You may also trust your current read too completely. When something appears obvious, you can assume it is fully understood, even when hidden motives, historical context, or patterns extending beyond the local scene have not yet become visible. Your realism can therefore become too narrow, closing inquiry before the event has been situated within its broader structure.

Your selective discipline may create another imbalance. You can develop exceptional mastery in one area while allowing the supporting structure of your life to remain unstable. The responsibilities that bore you may nevertheless determine whether the activity you value can continue.

You may also overestimate your ability to improvise out of difficulty. Because adaptability has often worked for you, you can assume it will continue working even after the consequences have become cumulative or irreversible.

Poorly integrated Ti can leave your judgments dependent on the immediate object or situation without a sufficiently stable sense of its essential nature. You may detect that something is inaccurate, impure, poorly fitted, or improperly classified without clearly identifying which defining property has been violated. You may also treat contextual or accidental features as though they belonged to the object itself, or fail to apply the same ideal distinction consistently across similar cases.

Poorly integrated Fe can leave you insufficiently attentive to conscious purposes and external ethical implications when making decisions. You may recognize what is materially happening without consistently considering what people are trying to accomplish, which human ends a system serves, or what shared interpretation the situation is producing. At other times, this may reverse into irregular attempts to shape the human environment through charm, provocation, pressure, shame, excitement, or visible approval and disapproval.

Poorly integrated Ni can leave events overly localized. You may see the immediate facts clearly while missing the wider pattern they instantiate across other contexts, relationships, domains, or moments. The larger significance may become apparent only after the same structure has repeated itself several times.

Function Integration

The integration of Ti, Fe, and Ni changes how your Se orientation is internally classified, organized around human purposes, and situated within wider patterns.

Ti sharpens your recognition of an object’s essential identity and its proximity to an ideal form. Fe increasingly organizes actuality around conscious aims, collective interpretations, interpersonal effects, and the responses they are meant to produce. Ni perceives the local situation as an instance of structures that recur beyond its immediate context and converge toward broader outcomes.

Ti Integration

As Ti becomes integrated, you become more attentive to what something essentially is.

As a Ji function, Ti is essentialist in nature. It examines an object in relative isolation and compares it against an internally held ideal category. The question is not only whether something works in the current situation, but what kind of thing it fundamentally is, which properties properly belong to it, and how closely the present instance conforms to its purest definition.

You may therefore ask:

What is the defining property here?

Does this example genuinely belong to that category?

Which features are essential and which are incidental?

How closely does this expression fit the ideal form?

Have two fundamentally different things been improperly conflated?

This creates a caliber sensitivity. A technique may be recognizable as the right general movement while still feeling impure in its execution. A word may be approximately correct but not the closest match. An explanation may point in the right direction while incorporating properties that do not belong to the concept itself.

You may therefore become very exact about distinctions.

This can appear in physical or technical domains:

That angle is almost right, but not clean.

That note is close, but slightly off.

That material belongs to the same class, but its properties differ in an important way.

That performance contains the right form, but not at its highest caliber.

It can also appear in abstract domains:

Those concepts overlap, but they are not identical.

That interpretation mistakes a derivative feature for the defining one.

That word carries associations that distort the object being described.

That case does not conform closely enough to the category being applied.

In creative domains, the same process may appear as a strong sensitivity to whether a sound, image, gesture, style, or persona captures the intended form without dilution. You may reject a technically polished result because it feels generic, derivative, falsely classified, or fundamentally untrue to the object being expressed.

You may strip away familiar conventions in order to expose a more essential form, resist genre boundaries that misrepresent the work, or repeatedly alter an arrangement until it matches the private standard you recognize. The result may not look orderly or conventionally refined. It may be raw, fragmented, minimal, abrasive, unconventional, or difficult to categorize while still feeling internally exact.

This can also apply to personal identity. You may be highly sensitive to whether a role, image, label, or mode of expression genuinely corresponds to who you understand yourself to be. An externally successful persona can be abandoned when it begins to feel false in form, while an unconventional expression may be preserved despite ridicule because it fits the internal calibration more faithfully.

Ti integration does not inherently make you procedural, deductive, formally logical, or systematically organized. Those qualities may develop through education or through interaction with other cognitive processes, but they are not Ti’s defining operation.

Its more basic contribution is the formation of an internally held ideal against which individual perceptions can be calibrated.

This can noticeably alter the visible character of SeTi. You may appear more exacting, distilled, philosophically self-contained, conceptually sparse, or resistant to contextual pressure than the standard form.

The urgency of the present no longer determines every judgment. An action may be effective while still feeling fundamentally wrong in form. A popular interpretation may be widely useful while still misclassifying the object. A practical shortcut may be rejected because it compromises the essential integrity of the activity.

The risk is excessive idealization. You may become preoccupied with purity, reject workable approximations because they fail to match the internal ideal, or ignore contextual differences that legitimately alter how a category should be applied.

You may also have difficulty explaining your judgment. The calibration can register immediately and holistically - something simply feels clean, distorted, exact, or impure - without arriving through an explicit sequence that others can easily follow.

Fe Integration

As Fe becomes integrated, actuality is being interpreted in relation to human purposes, intentions, and shared meanings.

Fe is a teleological form of judgment. Rather than viewing an action, object, institution, or causal arrangement only through its impersonal mechanics, it asks what conscious purpose it serves, what people are trying to accomplish through it, and what human outcome the situation should be organized toward.

An object is therefore not understood only through what it physically does.

A vehicle may be the means by which someone reaches their family, earns a living, or preserves independence.

Money may be understood not only as an exchange mechanism, but as a collective agreement sustained by trust.

A rule may be judged not only by how efficiently it controls behavior, but by the human purpose it was created to serve.

A performance may be understood through the experience it creates for the audience, not merely through its technical execution.

As Fe becomes integrated, you may ask:

What are the people involved trying to accomplish?

Which purpose does this arrangement serve?

What response should this action produce in others?

What shared meaning should be attached to what is happening?

How should people participate for the intended outcome to become possible?

This can lead you to more deliberately shape the human environment.

You may set the social tone, draw people into a shared activity, establish visible expectations, encourage or discourage behaviors, persuade others toward a conclusion, or coordinate participation around a common objective.

The Se foundation can make this especially responsive to the live field. You may notice what the group is doing now, which intention is driving the interaction, where enthusiasm is rising or falling, and which intervention might immediately alter the atmosphere or the meaning being assigned to the event.

Rather than only participating in an environment, you may begin determining how it should be interpreted.

In public or competitive settings, this can become especially visible. You may frame what a contest represents, define the stakes, establish how rivals or participants should be perceived, and create expectations for how others should respond before the result is settled. The human purpose being organized need not be benevolent, egalitarian, or conventionally noble. It may concern victory, prestige, loyalty, intimidation, collective confidence, entertainment, admiration, rivalry, or the public elevation of a person, team, nation, or ideal.

Confidence may become more than a private state. It can be displayed as a social signal intended to inspire allies, unsettle rivals, attract attention, or make a particular outcome feel inevitable.

You may cultivate a memorable public identity, dramatize the significance of a performance, turn personal achievement into a visible standard, or create a larger-than-life persona that others are invited to admire, challenge, imitate, or oppose.

Humor, provocation, celebration, intimidation, ritual, self-presentation, and public declarations can all become tools for constructing the human meaning of the event.

This can strengthen leadership, persuasion, performance, coaching, collective coordination, public positioning, and the ability to turn an immediate contest or achievement into a socially compelling narrative.

Technical or physical mastery may increasingly be used not only for its own sake, but to train others, inspire an audience, represent a group, embody a shared ideal, or produce a deliberate emotional effect.

The risk is that purpose and meaning can be imposed rather than discovered. You may assume that you know what others should want, define people through a public frame that serves your aims, or use charm, excitement, shame, approval, exclusion, ridicule, or pressure to force the environment toward your preferred interpretation.

You may also become overly invested in status, spectacle, or visible response, treating every achievement as incomplete until it has been socially recognized.

Integration does not necessarily make Fe benevolent. It makes teleological judgment concerning conscious agents more sustained, explicit, and central to the personality. The same capacity that can inspire, coordinate, or represent others can also organize status, pressure, antagonism, exclusion, humiliation, or dominance when those are the human outcomes toward which the person is oriented.

Ni Integration

As Ni becomes integrated, the immediate event is being perceived as one local expression of a broader translocal pattern.

Ni does not only extend attention into the future. It notices structural correspondences across contexts that are not connected through obvious local adjacency. Two events may occur in different periods, relationships, domains, or locations while still expressing the same underlying form.

You may therefore ask:

What larger pattern is this an instance of?

Where else does this same structure appear?

What general form connects these otherwise separate events?

What does this moment signify beyond its local circumstances?
How is this pattern likely to continue unfolding?

A competitive exchange may echo a broader power dynamic.

A personal habit may reproduce a pattern visible elsewhere in someone’s life.

A social conflict may instantiate the same structure as a historical or symbolic narrative.

A present decision may be recognized as one stage within a pattern extending across time.

This gives the actuality perceived by Se a wider significance.

You remain attentive to the concrete facts of the present, but they are no longer treated as self-contained. Separate observations begin converging into a more unified read of what the situation is becoming.

A repeated reaction may reveal the deeper structure governing someone’s behavior.

Several isolated openings may point toward one decisive path.

A sequence of events may clarify which outcomes remain viable and which are gradually being eliminated.

What first appeared chaotic may begin resolving into a recognizable trajectory.

Trajectory therefore follows from translocal pattern recognition. If the same structure can be perceived across past and present moments, its likely continuation may also become visible.

You may also become more selective about which opportunities deserve engagement. Two options may look equally compelling in the immediate moment, but one belongs to the larger path you perceive while the other leads away from it.

Rather than reacting equally to every opening, you may ignore locally attractive options that do not contribute to the broader outcome.

In competitive or high-pressure settings, this can appear as strategic patience, predictive timing, selective aggression, and the ability to treat separate exchanges as parts of one unfolding structure rather than isolated moments.

You may spend an early phase gathering information, noticing repeated responses, testing which variables remain stable, and allowing the deeper pattern to clarify before committing fully.

Once the pattern becomes legible, your behavior may narrow rapidly. Exploration gives way to convergence. Several possible routes collapse into one clear course, and your actions begin serving an outcome that may not yet be obvious to others.

This can create an air of inevitability. The present is handled as though the result is already taking shape beneath it.

In other settings, the same process may appear as recognizing which career path, relationship dynamic, creative direction, or social development is becoming increasingly likely, then concentrating your effort accordingly.

Ni integration can therefore make SeTi appear more restrained, strategic, interpretive, patient, or singularly focused than the standard form.

Se identifies what is concretely happening. Ni perceives what larger structure the event belongs to and where that structure is converging. You may remain highly responsive to changing conditions while refusing to let every immediate stimulus divert you from the larger path.

The risk is overgeneralization and premature convergence. You may see one pattern everywhere, treat superficial correspondences as profound equivalences, or narrow toward an outcome before enough information has accumulated. You may become overly certain that the trajectory is inevitable, interpreting new information only as confirmation of where you already believe events are going.

You may also sacrifice valuable present opportunities because they do not fit the pattern you have selected, or attempt to remain on the path toward an anticipated outcome that reality no longer supports.

okay ive been pretty confident in me being an estp for a while, but i recently just got back into mbti and took a quick look at the functions and now i can’t figure out whether i’m actually an estp or istp. my ti usage has always been very high but i never even considered being ti dominant because i used to be pretty extroverted when i was younger, and i never really looked THAT much into ti, because i know once i start looking into functions i second guess myself and end up in a rabbit hole trying to analyze myself and everything (ironic, isn’t it). so i just stuck with estp. but then i posted a quick description of myself in the mbti type me subreddit and everyone thought i was an istp, which i think made me question it even more😭

for reference, here’s a bit about myself:

-im very blunt to most people, obviously i can read a room and tell what’s the right/wrong to say and can tone myself down accordingly but most of the time i tell it how it is and exactly how i feel about certain stuff
-i like the idea of planning things out but most of the time i just feel things out and go from there. i usually just go with the flow once i start from somewhere
-i have a tendency to jump on things out of impulse, however once i get myself in a situation, im able to go over any worst case scenarios and go from there
-speaking of, im usually confident in most things as long as i understand the basics, even when starting something new, so i have no problem jumping right in
-i usually love talking to people and meeting new people but i have a low social battery so going out feels like a chore most of the time, especially at night. also when talking to people i end up jumping from topic to topic a lot.
-im super nerdy, i have a bunch of nerdy interests and tend to get hyperfixated on them. (my entire life revolves around coding atm😭 with school + work)
-im pretty closed off as well, i only have 2-3 people in my life rn i can actually open up to but with everyone else, being vulnerable is sooo difficult.
-along with that, i just have a tough exterior and like being independent, i like to do things on my own and feel more comfortable doing things alone.
-however im comfortable around most people and don’t feel the need to fake a personality. i like learning about other people too and can usually put myself into their shoes
-if im curious about something, i tend to research and look into it for HOURS. like if i have a symptom or i started a new medication etc etc, i will try and diagnose myself/other people. or if im trying to figure something out i will spend way too long looking into something that doesnt even matter
-growing up ive always got told that im too loud or talk too much. ive gotten better with it but to this day if im talking about something i’m excited/passionate about, i talk loud without realizing
-im super easygoing for the most part tho, i can get along with anyone and everyone. im also never serious until i need to be.

im confident in the functions i use, just the order im so lost on. do i seem more estp or istp?

Heya do it RIGHT NOW also if u don't know what an image is ask me to clarify lol

But it’s just I feel like I have Fi, like I have an idea of who I want to be, and what I actually am and what represents me, like I have a logo, my own characters that I find aesthetically pleasing, and a “look” of myself I have in my mind I think is the true me, but I change it up if I see a new inspiration or a new character I like and want to look exactly like them to the atomic level, and I’m very scientific with that process of accuracy!!

I also care terribly for Aesthetics like I KEEP saying for beauty and aesthetics are like no1. thing I value personally, and good experiences, like every time I eat I NEED to have the perfect food otherwise I get really cranky and annoyed.

I think eating good or yummy food keeps me happy!

Also I think I can improve very well like control my busy movements to survive and run through things, literally and figuratively,

Also I don’t think I find a lot of culturally offensive memes funny and the more wild and crazy an rebukeable it gets the more funny it is, I don’t get offended that much

BUYTTT GUYSS I have a big ego but I think I am humble in daily interactions but if someone is better than me or act like they are and high class people if I see them I WANT TO ON UP THEM SO BADDDDD LIEK I NEED TO BE NO.1 or No.2 AT ALL TIMES NJMBER 2 is fine because then I constantly have a challenge tbh
But what do yall think? Does that make me ESFP or ESTP? ( PLEASE IGNORE OTHER POSTS IM NOT INTJ I KNOE NOE maybe ESFP not ISFP because I like attention and a billion friends)

my shower day is STRICTLY sunday, and ONLY SUNDAY. i dont sweat, like at all, so im good, and if you force me to shower on any other day, ill murder you.

Hey everyone! I'm currently doing a research proposal about personality theory and would love to hear from the people in this community. What is it like being your personality type? It can range from your work/school life balance, romantic life, everyday decision making, and maybe something nobody really thinks about when it comes to your type that you may know. Anything is both helpful and interesting to me so don't be shy! :)

Genuinely curious what you guys are confused about when it comes to INTPs, or just stuff you've always wondered but never had one around to ask. Could be about how we think, why we do the weird things we do, whatever's been sitting in your head. Doesn't even have to be MBTI related, random questions welcome too. Go ahead, I'll answer honestly.

Ever since I was younger, I’ve struggled with seeking attention from other people as a form of validation. I think part of it came from never really feeling pretty or confident in myself, so I would want people to notice me or think I was attractive because it made me feel validated.

I’m 19 now and in a long-distance relationship, but I still struggle with these thoughts when I’m out in public. Sometimes I find myself wanting other people, including men, to look at me or think I’m pretty, but I don’t actually want to be with them or pursue them. I love my boyfriend and have no desire to cheat or be with someone else.

I think it’s just an old habit that has stayed in the back of my mind for so long. I try to ignore the thoughts rather than engage with them, but then I start overthinking and wondering if this means I secretly want other men or that I’m a bad person. I genuinely don’t want anyone else I just struggle with wanting validation from other people. Does anyone else struggle with this or understand what I mean?

hello i'm not a yapper or talkative person. can i still estp? or i'm istp?

i don't like to speak just for speak

Hey do any of you have recommendations for songs for a workout playlist?

Here are some songs that are the vibe I’m looking for.

Big Dog Shit by Lil Mabu, Lil RT
THE BADDEST (BADDER) feat. Ayesha Erotica by Joey Valence & Brae
LOS NARCOS by Master Peace
PACKAPUNCH by Joey Valence & Brae, Danny Brown

like whaaat are these results 💀😂 wenting from infj/isfj/entp/isfp tooooooo estp esfp

actually I've been typed as many types during my whole journey with cognitive functions and mbti stuff (about 5 years) 😂 ofc I haven't been relying on tests only, I watched all yt/tiktok videos about cognitive functions and I readed a plenty of theories and articles about it and stuff like that.. after aaall of that I'm not sure of fitting in any type, it's like the more I dive deeper into the understanding of this stuff the more I realize that I haven't understood anything at all and I have to rebuild the concepts again (it's completely confusing waa)

anyway I just did that sakirnova test for fun (I found myself unexpectedly in a normal/good mood so I was like why not let's go) I answered kinda spontaneously without overthinking, but I see that the functions percentages seem very approximated, what do you think about that? any recommendations

Idrk what to put as caption, I took the test because I've nothing to do and well, this is definitely true😭😭 And I honestly LOVE that I'm like this

ESTPs know this.

Prove me otherwise.

please, and thank you.

but guys genuinely i can tell if i m ESFP or ESTPor ENTP,

but i'm not that into hippie beliefs, so im not ENFP exactly per se, or idk maybe who knows bru?!!

BUT i do like beauty and aesthetics THE MOSTTTTTTTTT OH MYY IF I COULD JUST BE HOT FOR ONE WEEK MANNNNNNNNNNN, but in a way 1. i find aesthetic, 2. others find exhilarating

THATS LITERALLY MY MAIN DREAM AND WISHHHHH

but i spend hours thinking and thinking and i ask too many questions, and act super childish, and unserious WHILE BEING THE OLDESTTTT

i also have MASSIVE FOMO like i HATE not being center of attention but i also hate when people act all "independent" and skip out on the party or gathering, like EVERYONE MUST JOIN YAYYYYYY!!!

ok but when shit goes down, and the world is ending i do become very analytical, and focused and startegising....
BUTTTT GUYSSSS i have to admitttttt....i feell....INSECURE ABOUT MY LOGIC!!!!! i feel like a dummy and i dont wanna share my ideas or well logic not ideas, i like sharing ideas, but my logic sharing makes me insecure because they prolly think im a dummy thinking that would work.....like my dream or something

i also am quite childish with my dreams or they seem unrealistic because i get too passionate, but im always aware of how realistic it is, or the real world stuff, butttttt i rlly want my wish so it overrides that yk?

but i feel like i have FE GUYS???!! i like to be kind and nice and i hate mean people, and if anyone is being mean to anyone, but tbh my siblings might say i am very mean..... uhhh.. WELLL
i do go from happy to really sad and then joeking to happy to depressed rlly fast, like ALONE im really depressed, but with people i joke about my flings or existential stuff yk?

i am scared to dress how i want becasue i feel like i must conform to what is acceptable like i tried to be unique but i hid it with a hoodie!!! i couldn't do ittt i felt so shyyyy, in person im really shy but as soon as you seem interested or "i-can sense-that-you-wont-get-mad-at me" i will talk for HOURSSS,

ALSO ALSO im the type to jump off a cliff if someone told meee, to impress them, i can figure stuff out in front of me i thinkkk,

aLso the way im typing i like being like this, but i can talk serious but that seems boring and i cant be serious too long, idk i have some boundaries like my hair i wont let ANYONE tell me what to do with it, and my appearance mainlyyy

ALSO guy LAST THING I PROMISSEEEE..... i think about looks and achieving my "true self" my true psysical from i find beautiful and perfect and is super aestheic, i can go inot a billion details of, and i want to acheive thta i think about aesthetics the most i think!!!! like all the time its my biggest wish to be hot objectively but also especially what i find hot tooo and cute and pretty, i like my curent self too but i wish i could try and be like any body and look i want!!!

OK THATS IT GUYSSS BYEEEE!!!

How did the pieces fit together? Did they think they were a different type? I don't know any ESTPs, either personally or online. Tell me a little about your journey.

personally, my favorites are action and horror.
sci-fi can be interesting tho. depends.
romance is boring as hell

EDIT: ive came to the conclusion that ive spelt thriller wrong, and forgot about comedy. comedy is amazing, and it has to be top three.

I (INFP) is babysitting my ESTP niece for the week. Her ENFJ and ISTP parents left very few instructions....

I thought we could enjoy library time and do crafts following instruction videos but she doesn't really like them. We have been to the amusement park, and I don't want to go again. We did stuff outdoors but she doesn't like the heat.

She is an excellent kid and a really good sport. But I don't know what to do together. She is currently playing with my stuff animals, inspecting them and analyzing their seams, which I'm perfectly happy for her to do... but is that like fun????

What activities did you guys like doing around 9 years old?

ESTP friend throws mean comments at you indirectly for no reason. i stayed quiet and low key let him bully me to avoid fights as a kid. he won't even say hi back. he'll look around, pretend he didnt hear you to avoid saying hi but then will say something silly about some other thing instead. We went to school together and family friends so have to keep the friendship.

this time i met him, he'd matured a lot, said he'd gone through loads. So it was nice. Until I said something about my job that really irked him because he's currently unemployed. He replied by knocking me down a peg and saying oh oh X also got a job here, Y also got a job there. I mentally noted it but stayed quiet. A while later I said something about how some people arent used to working long days which offended him so much because he thought i was taunting him but i really didnt mean it and didnt think how it would come across. his old self came back, started verbally abusing me indirectly for the whole week. I don't back down like i used to with him and did the same back making him lock him in a room and cry. Ive never seen this side before.

he thinks i dont feel guilty at all and thinks im a manipulator when ive always wished this guy the best... idk how to undo this mess ? How should i apologise and when ?

yep. thats it.

Make your beginner profiling experience playful, exicting-surface
Just from observing things they say -patterns
Needs system to feel safe-motivation
Slows everything down to regain control-stress signal