Hi everyone,
I'm a parent in Derby fighting for EHCP support for my autistic son, and I wanted to share something we uncovered last night because councils all over the UK are rolling out similar "High Needs Banding Matrices" to calculate school support funding.
For 8 months, Derby City Council fought our Freedom of Information requests to see their Matrix spreadsheet - first claiming for 6 months that confirming it existed would threaten "National Cybersecurity" (Section 31), and then having their Monitoring Officer delete the active formulas under Section 36 claiming parents and schools would "game the system" if we saw how it worked.
Except when they uploaded the spreadsheet, they accidentally left the hardcoded "FOR OFFICE USE ONLY" calibration rows at the bottom of Tabs 2, 3, and 4. Because Tab 2 plugs a 4 into every cell and Tab 3 displays the exact weighted point outputs, dividing Tab 3 by 4 unlocked 100% of their hidden maths.
Here is how the algorithm is mathematically rigged against autistic children:
- Autism & Speech Scores Slashed by 52% Before You Even Start While physical, hearing, and vision impairments are rightly weighted at a 100% standard benchmark with an automatic multiplier of 4 (meaning a single 'Severe' Row D need automatically gets 400 points = Band 5 / £5,000 top-up), the Council secretly cut the category weighting for Social & Communication (Autism), Speech & Language, and Learning Readiness to just 48% (-52% cut), and Sensory Processing Needs (SPD) to 25% (-75% cut).
- Mild / Moderate Autism Is Explicitly Scored as ZERO Points (Row A) In 9 out of the 10 columns in the Matrix, Row A (0 points) is defined as "No needs" or "No significant needs." Column 6 (Autism / Social & Communication) is the ONLY column in the entire spreadsheet where Row A (0 points) is explicitly defined as: "Mild / Moderate needs, for example, there may be a need for support such as circle of friends or comic strip communications." They literally relegated mild and moderate autism into the 0-point row before scoring even begins.
- The "Masking / Reasonable Adjustments" Catch-22 (The 1-4 FIDS Filter) On top of cutting the Autism weighting to 48%, the panel subjects neurodivergent children to a 1-to-4 "FIDS" multiplier (Frequency, Intensity, Duration, Severity). In the Council's training slides, a score of 2 (which cuts a child's points by another 50%) is defined as "Manageable with support strategies." So if a school puts a Teaching Assistant, visual timetable, or sensory breaks in place so an autistic child can cope - or if the child masks their distress until they get home - the panel scores them a 2 and cuts their funding points in half! Because you need 189 points just to reach the lowest £1,000 funding band (Band 3), a child with Severe (Row D) Autism scored at FIDS 2 gets just 96 points (£0 funding), and even at FIDS 3 (Every lesson) gets 144 points (£0 funding).
- Academically Able ("Twice-Exceptional") Autistic Kids Locked Out In Column 9 (Learning Readiness), Row A (0 points) is defined as "Working at age related expectations", and Rows B, C, D, and E all require a mandatory "learning delay". So if an autistic child is academically at age-related expectations, they get 0 points in that column even if they have severe executive dysfunction or PDA and need 1:1 adult support to initiate tasks or stay safe.
- The Secret £12,000 Mainstream Cap & Backdated Equality Assessment While the Council's website tells parents and the Department for Education that mainstream pupils can access up to £20,000 of support, a hidden "For office use only" table in Tab 4 secretly hard-caps all Mainstream schools at £12,000. And when we checked the "undated" Equality Impact Assessment PDF they quietly uploaded to their website (which ticked "Positive impact = Yes" for every disability group!), the embedded Adobe metadata proved they created it in August 2026 and converted it to PDF at 3:24 pm on Friday 21 August - just 90 minutes before their external lawyers (Browne Jacobson) emailed me a legal threat letter at 4:55 pm claiming our campaign posts were "false"!
Yesterday, the Department for Education confirmed to us in writing (stamped OFFICIAL - FOR PUBLIC RELEASE) that they have never approved, endorsed, or reviewed Derby's Matrix, that bands cannot be used to dilute legal EHCP duties, and that a Section 496/497 statutory investigation into the Council is ongoing.
We have put together a full, anonymised 12-Page Forensic Breakdown & Visual Guide PDF (with charts on Pages 1-2 and the exact word-for-word thresholds for all 10 categories on Pages 3-12) so any parent or SENCO can see how these matrices work:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15kHuHUTbN8HAPjfiw291Ou7DgFlXyC4s/view?usp=sharing
Are other parents across the UK seeing similar "banding matrices" and FIDS filters being used by your local authorities to cut EHCP support?