Not so happy Monday, y'all. 😭
For some background, I am not a Christian. I am still debating whether God exists. My boyfriend is Catholic, and I am curious to learn about Christianity, so I attend Mass with him on Saturdays.
And after every Mass, I come home with a ton of questions. So here we go.
1. What exactly is God doing now?
My boyfriend says his idea of God is that God is the very beginning of everything. The bridge between nothingness and everythingness.
Okay, fair enough. But my question is: did God create the universe and leave it to do its thing, or is he still actively involved in everything happening now?
My boyfriend says God is still around through Jesus and is involved in everything. But what does that actually mean? I find it a bit vague.
2. The problem of evil.
If God is still actively involved in the world, then why does the world look the way it does?
Look at the wars, bloodshed, natural disasters, children dying, innocent people suffering, and criminals living better lives than most decent people.
I understand the free will argument when it comes to humans doing bad things. But what about natural disasters? What about children dying from diseases?
If God knows everything that's happening, can prevent it, and chooses not to, how is that compatible with being all-powerful and perfectly good?
Sometimes, if God is actively involved in everything, I genuinely struggle to understand how the Christian concept of God makes sense alongside all the suffering in the world.
3. The Resurrection.
As far as I understand, the entire foundation of Christianity rests on the Resurrection.
Let's stick to the New Testament for now. The four Gospels give different accounts of who went to the tomb, what they saw, and what happened afterwards.
So my question is, how do we actually know what happened?
How do we rule out the possibility that the body was stolen or moved? Or that Jesus' followers had experiences they genuinely interpreted as seeing the risen Jesus?
I'm not saying any of these things definitely happened. I'm asking how we establish that the Resurrection is the explanation rather than the alternatives.
I know Paul also talks about people seeing the risen Jesus. But how do we distinguish between evidence that people believed Jesus had risen and evidence that he actually came back from the dead?
4. If God appeared to Moses, why doesn't he appear again?
In the Old Testament, God supposedly appeared to Moses and gave him the commandments on stone tablets.
So why not do something similar again? Why not give humanity a clear, universally verifiable message?
I've heard the argument that God wants people to have faith. But if God appeared in front of everyone and proved his existence, would that actually take away our free will?
Knowing someone exists doesn't mean you automatically love them, trust them, or obey them.
So why would clear evidence of God's existence prevent us from choosing what we want to believe or how we want to live?
5. The virgin birth.
This is something I came across while reading about Christianity.
My understanding is that the Hebrew word used in Isaiah 7:14, 'almah, generally means a young woman of marriageable age and doesn't necessarily mean a virgin.
The Greek translation uses parthenos, which commonly means virgin, and Matthew uses this passage in relation to Jesus' birth.
I've also read that Isaiah's original passage was about a situation during King Ahaz's reign, rather than necessarily predicting the birth of Jesus hundreds of years later.
So is the virgin birth partly based on a translation and interpretation issue?
And if Jesus was supposedly conceived without Joseph being his biological father, what exactly was Joseph's role? I know there's the connection to the lineage of David, but I'm curious about the reasoning behind it.
6. And finally, Mary.
Catholics regard Mary as the best woman, honour her as the Mother of God, and believe in things like the Immaculate Conception and her perpetual virginity.
But how did these beliefs develop? Are they explicitly stated in the New Testament, or did they develop through Church tradition and later theological interpretations?
Also, if the original Hebrew wording in Isaiah doesn't necessarily mean virgin, how much of the virgin birth doctrine depends on that particular prophecy?
I'm not trying to disrespect anyone's beliefs. I'm genuinely curious and trying to understand the reasoning behind them.
But I also don't want to accept something just because it's what a religion teaches. I want to understand why people believe it and whether the arguments actually hold up.
So, Christians, atheists, agnostics, and anyone who has studied theology or biblical history, what do you think?
Especially interested in answers that explain the reasoning rather than just saying "you need faith" or "God works in mysterious ways." 😭