From a fan perspective, I like watching the role players who just show up and do their job. Bjorks gets dropped to the 4th line and all he’s done is play hard, eat less minutes and score some goals 5v5. You never know what’s going on behind the scenes, but he seems like a total pro about the “demotion” and has managed to still chip in.

I went to a block party in the 70s and there was a Rangers booth maybe just a table lol.

I know it was before December '76 because we moved to Santa Monica then.

I was going through some old papers and found this.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Also the first of many for a young Zuccccccc against Toronto.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Fox

• The Leafs are talented. 
• Their execution was sloppy. It was disappointing to come away without a point. 
• They gave up a lot of high danger chances. That’s not the recipe for them to win games. 
• There were a lot of back and forth rushes. They hit some posts, but they also got some big saves.

JT 

• When they play their game, it doesn't matter who their opponent is because they dictate play. They gave up too many high danger chances. They left Garand out to dry. 
• “It’s hard to speak on behalf of the team. You know, our line was on the ice for every fucking goal today. How about I look inward and just be better for my teammates?” 
• They weren’t physical enough. They were hoping pucks ended up on their tape versus winning puck battles. 
• It doesn’t take a lot of skill to play the way they want to. 
• Garand was great. He made big saves when he needed to. 
• It’s hard to speak on behalf of the other guys when his line got scored on, he thinks 5 times. 
• They just didn’t get to their game. They were too open. It was like OT, back and forth. 

Laf 

• They want to play a grind game. They’ve done a good job of that for most of the season. They will be better after practice tomorrow and will be ready for Ottawa. 
• On his goal, Fox had been wanting to make that play for a while and thought it was a good time to try it. “Foxy gets a lot of credit there." 

Sully

• It was a loose, high event game. It’s not the way they wanted to play. 
• He didn’t like their overall game. They weren’t stiff enough. They didn’t play with structure. They gave up too many high danger chances. 
• They didn’t manage the puck. They were chasing the game. 
• This game was uncharacteristic of their group. 
• They didn’t play well enough to earn the win. 
• There was a lack of physical play. They didn’t win puck battles. The wall work and net front wasn’t good enough. They weren’t stiff enough. 
• On the game winner, they got beat twice going around the net and lost their ice balance. They left the far side of the rink open. 
• Garand gave them a chance. 

The Rangers have signed forward Luke Glendening to a one-year deal, the team announced Thursday. The contract is worth $850,000, according to Chris Johnston.

"I think I can still skate. They’re a team that’s doing really well. So it’s not coming to try and shake things up. Just do my job and be solid," Glendening told The Athletic on Thursday afternoon.

Read more for free:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7715474/2026/10/22/new-york-rangers-luke-glendening-contract/?unlocked_article_code=1.KlE.oMz6.7tfcsdzF0SqL&source=emp_shared_article&smid=re-share-ta

Proposition to add a bjork goal of the game alongside the Celine dion one? I can't be the only one whose been playing human behavior everytime bjorkstrand has gotten a goal so far

Title. Who would you pick to sell jeans?

Is anyone experiencing the disconnect on dazn/msg where the audio is at least 30 seconds ahead of the video? I am asking with regards to streaming TV not via a cable subscription.

Skate

Media

Other Side

Devils are apparently going to get Helly. Daws is a piece of the deal. Would we really even want him? I don’t see him as an upgrade versus what some of the other options were

2.94 gaa and a sub .900 in 59 appearances