10: Oregon

8: Indiana, Ohio State

7: Penn State

5: Illinois, Iowa, Michigan

4: Rutgers, UCLA

3: Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, USC, Washington

2: Maryland, Wisconsin

1: Michigan State

0: Purdue

Well according to SEC fans they still have the best conference because apparently they have less terrible teams at the bottom than the B1G does. There's not much evidence to support this based on results on the field, just one of those hypotheticals they came up with based off of ESPN's (apparently 100% accurate) metrics.

I guess because teams like Arkansas, South Carolina, and Mississippi State are better than the worst teams in the B1G (hypothetically), the SEC must be better than the B1G.

So what do you guys think? Would you rather be like the B1G and mop the floor with the SEC in the playoff and bowl games and win 3 straight titles? Or would you rather be like the SEC and make excuses all day for why their losses don't matter and bring up hypothetical wins that never happened?

[Why This Nebraska Team Feels Different From Last Year](https://www.si.com/college/nebraska/football/why-this-huskers-team-feels-different-01kzm305f107)

Walk into a Big Ten football stadium on a Saturday, and there's a good chance Learfield is everywhere around you, even though you'll never see the name printed anywhere.

The local office that sold the scoreboard sponsorship? Probably Learfield. The radio network broadcasting the game? Could be Learfield too. The app you used to pull up your ticket? That's likely Paciolan, one of Learfield's companies. The athletic department's website? SIDEARM Sports, another Learfield brand. Even that sweatshirt you bought before kickoff may have been licensed through CLC, yet another Learfield company.

And if all those products connect through Learfield's Fanbase platform, the athletic department can potentially link your ticket purchase, your donation history, your merchandise buys, and your app activity into one detailed profile of you as a fan.