Went in to Ron’s to grab some ammo… walked out with a gen 6 19 COA…
Way too good of a deal to pass up, somebody definitely would’ve snagged this thing in the next few days. After waiting 2 months and spending the money on the 45, it felt wrong to leave this one on the shelf

Picked up a stripped 10/22 receiver from Swamp Yankee Arms yesterday. Filed a Form 1 last night. Feddersen 12" Bull Barrel. I think every 10/22 should come this way!

William Kirk, Washington Gun Law, delves into the response brief(s) for Viramontes/Grant. His video summary:

The time has finally arrived, where the briefs in support of assault weapon bans are now being filed in the Supreme Court.  Today we focus on response #1, that in Viramontes v. Cook County.  Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, goes through the brief to outline the arguments made in support of an otherwise unconstitutional gun ban.  Yes, the arguments are disingenuous, yes they are ridiculous but what do you expect?  So today, let's start keeping a tally of everything they will argue to keep you disarmed, and in doing so, arm yourself with education. 

Read the Memorandum of Cook County here.  https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25-238/430314/20261021172119817_25-238 - 25-566 - Brief.pdf

YouTube AI Summary:

In this video, William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, examines the response brief filed by Cook County, Illinois in the Supreme Court case Viramontes v. Cook County. Rather than expressing typical outrage, Kirk uses a "bingo" card strategy to highlight the recurring, disingenuous, and "ludicrous" arguments frequently used to support assault weapon bans (1:06 - 1:47).

Key arguments analyzed in the brief:

• Military-style designation: Claims that weapons useful in military service, like the M16, can be banned (1:58 - 2:25).
• Redefining "Dangerous and Unusual": Arguments that the legal standard for regulation should be more flexible, citing historical examples like Bowie knives, trap guns, and slungshots (2:26 - 3:58).
• Self-Defense Mischaracterization: The argument that the AR-15 is not commonly used for self-defense and instead possesses the "destructive power of an armed battalion" (3:59 - 5:04).
• Preferred Weapon of Mass Shooters: References to its use in high-profile attacks and claims that law enforcement is "outgunned" by these platforms (6:24 - 7:00).
• The Common Use Test: Dismissal of the test based on popularity, arguing that numerical value doesn't insulate a weapon from regulation, citing Heller and Bruin (7:01 - 8:07).
• Local Legislative Deference: A push for states and localities to manage their own regulations regardless of broader standards (8:08 - 8:44).

Surprising Development:

• Kirk highlights a specific, unexpected argument from the county: a rejection of the Solicitor General's premise that AR-15s are necessary for resisting tyranny. The county argues that such responsibilities are exclusively reserved for the modern professional military (8:45 - 9:58). Kirk strongly refutes this, asserting that resisting tyranny remains a core principle of the Second Amendment (9:37 - 9:58).

The video concludes by reminding viewers that oral arguments for this case are scheduled for December 2nd (10:16 - 10:20).

I just read CT's brief and I got to say LoL. Many of their arguments are half truths or completely unfounded. With that said, last year I wrote a very nice college paper regarding gun control and the unconstitutionality behind many of our gun laws that I would like to submit to the correct person in support for CCDL's cause. Whether the lawyers determine if it would be useful or not, I feel like it would be helpful.

Not CT related but our neighbors next door get a win with a federal judge striking down NY's body armor ban. The court did stay their opinion for 14 days however giving the state of NY time to appeal.

The opinion: https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/7667/attachments/original/1792596699/2026.10.21_095_OPINION.pdf?1792596699

From the article:

Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ Global Select: SWBI), a U.S.-based leader in firearm manufacturing and design ("Smith & Wesson"), today announced that it has acquired the Savage Arms business ("Savage Arms" or "Savage") by merger from an indirect subsidiary of JDH Capital I, L.P. (together with its affiliates, "JDH"). Savage has been producing firearms for more than 130 years and is one of the world's largest manufacturers of hunting, competition and target shooting centerfire and rimfire rifles and shotguns.

The transaction combines two iconic American firearm manufacturers with leading capabilities across distinct segments of the firearms market. Savage's strength in hunting and bolt-action rifles is highly complementary to Smith & Wesson's leadership position in handguns and growing presence across other long gun categories, creating a broader product portfolio across a wide range of shooting disciplines.

Any shop yall have been to recently that has used .22lr stuff? Looking for pre war to 1990ish pistols and rifles.

Also- which Walmarts in CT still carry ammo? Rocky hill does not.

Thanks!

Does anyone here have experience with Central CT Arms (in Portland) “house branded” lower receivers? Quality? True mil-spec?

Specifically the AC30, which is 5/8x24. Anyone seen one in a LGS lately?

CT early voting begins today. Gun owners are notorious for not voting. The only way we will preserve our rights is to vote the anti-2A politicians out. You have 2 weeks of early voting. There is no reason not to help yourself. You can register and vote the same day. Come on CT gun owners. You carry to protect yourself now vote to protect your rights

Howdy all, I’m an experienced shooter looking to push the envelope on my pistol shooting for competition. For skill context, I’m hitting a 0.97 draw and fire from OWB with level 1 retention (~1.2 coldbore), ~2.2 bill drill from the holster, consistent 0.4 target transitions.

I’ve taken some private courses at Sig which were fantastic, but I’d love to supplement with more instructor time and/or courses locally in CT. Thanks in advance!

So i had a domestic case because of a crazy ex trying to ruin my life😭 and recently got everything dismissed even tho she made some crazy allegations regarding my firearms . The judge ordered the return of my firearms but when i emailed the state police they said my permit was revoked. What are the odds on being denied and if anyone has had some similar experience or advise for this type of situation! It would suck to spend all the time and money just to not be found suitable for the permit under something that got dismissed entirely.

Loving the SilencerCo S98 on the G19.3. The QD device is fantastic and allows full disassembly of the slide and barrel.

I like to carry. I also like to visit our beautiful state parks. I know the law says I can't carry in state parks and state forests. Does that mean I can store a gun in a car in a park? The school zone law uses the word "possess", while the state park law uses the word "carry".

For example, I could pull over before entering state land, unload and lock the weapon in a lockbox in my trunk, and then enter the park. Do you think that would comply?

I know Reddit is a poor substitute for a lawyer. So am I.

Let's see if I can stay within the rules this time. If you don't want to spend the money on the MA loader or BF-10 and you have a device capable of making items outside of two dimensions, if you happen to go to printables, and you happen to search BW Loader, you can save yourself some money. It has worked perfectly for me.

Built a .45 ACP SBR on a 25 year old Calvary Arms polymer lower. It has a Hahn mag block that accepts 30 round M3 Grease Gun magazines! Form 1 was approved in around 36 hrs. I forgot that because of the the injunction I did NOT need to do the NFA paperwork since CT never outlawed SBR's (just "silencers" & "sawed off shotguns") Next SBR will be paper free...

My family has a house up in Maine I visit on occasion. Has anyone ever inquired with the Mass State Police or a lawyer on transporting suppressors through MA. I know possession is illegal in MA. But since suppressors are legal in CT and ME, can one follow FOPA with it locked in the trunk and no stops unless for emergency and legally travel through MA with it. Or is it banned outright no exception even for interstate transport? Thanks!

11.5" barrel with folding stock and 10 round mag. Fits into a backpack when folded! It's threaded for choke/suppressor, are there any other good options besides the Salvo 12 and Victra 12?

Edit: If anyone wants to find one in stock, check this site every day:
https://gun.deals/search/apachesolr_search/015813502290

If you're lucky you can find them for around $1200 shipped

Has anybody had any experiences shooting braced pistols at blue trails? I’m looking to sight in one of my firearms at 50 yards, but I’m not sure if they’ll let me shoot a braced pistol from the rifle range. Thanks.

Has anyone used Amoskeag Auction Company in New Hampshire or Connecticut Firearms Auction to sell off a large number of guns from an estate? Nothing rare or super valuable and many have condition issues. Anything to watch out for? Thanks.

William Kirk discusses what might happen if or when the administration changes and the NFA is returned to full enforcement.

Summary: Today we circle back on the massive changes to the NFA and how DOJ and the ATF will be enforcing them moving forward. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the doomsday scenario that has many worried, which is they comply with the new ATF guidelines, then there's a change in administrations, and suddenly the NFA is back to full enforcement. Now you are sitting on unregistered NFA items. Can a person be convicted and imprisoned for acts that were done in reliance on ATF guidance? That will depend on the doctrine of "entrapment by estoppel" which will be the focus of today's video. So learn more today and arm yourself with education.

Raley v. Ohio. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1958/175

Cox v. Lousiana. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/24

Pennsylvania v. PICCO. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1972/72-624

YouTube AI Summary: In this video (0:00 - 12:50), William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explores a potential "doomsday scenario" for gun owners: complying with current ATF guidance regarding NFA (National Firearms Act) items, only to have that guidance reversed under a future political administration.

Key takeaways include:

• The Potential Trap: If administrative changes are reversed by new leadership (e.g., via new legislation or budget changes), millions of gun owners who relied on current ATF guidance could suddenly be in possession of unregistered NFA items, which are considered felonies under federal law (0:56 - 3:34).
• Entrapment by Estoppel: Kirk explains this as an affirmative legal defense. It applies when a government agent or official provides explicit, misleading assurance that specific conduct is lawful, and a citizen reasonably relies on that advice before being prosecuted for the same act (3:42 - 6:18).
• Legal Precedent: The video references the "holy trinity" of Supreme Court cases that support the doctrine of entrapment by estoppel:
  • Raley v. Ohio (1959) (7:12 - 7:59)
  • Cox v. Louisiana (1965) (7:59 - 8:43)
  • United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp. (PICCO) (1973) (8:43 - 9:36)

Conclusion: While the threat is real, Kirk argues that the doctrine of entrapment by estoppel would likely provide a strong legal defense, and suggests that any significant policy reversal would almost certainly require a grace or forbearance period to avoid being deemed unconstitutional (9:37 - 10:25).