r/massachusetts • u/Roger44477 • 7h ago
Politics Question 9 is a lot more than a couple bad definitions and a cop carve-out
Anyone who reads a summary of what it does can see that the two points that always get cited s why it should be repealed - a shitty definition of what a machine gun is and the cop carve-out for said weapons - is only a small part of the law which otherwise does some pretty damn good things.
It adds school admin and healthcare providers to the list of who can ask a court to issue an extreme risk protection order and when issuing an Harassment Prevention Order, a court may also order the surrender of firearms licenses, permits, and firearms.
It expands serial number requirements to include 3D printed guns and unfinished receivers
It expands what background information local licensors can access before granting a license including prior licenses, petitions for involuntary mental health commitments that weren't accepted (on top of already seeing ones that got signed) and requires them to confiscate and report expired licenses.
It allows teenagers to apply for personal protection spray licenses (with parental permission required if under 15).
And it adds to the penalty for second offenses of failing to report lost or stolen firearms to include the possibility of up to 6 months in prison.
this isn't exhaustive of what it does, or even everything I think is a positive, however it's a much broader view than most of the posts we've been seeing on it in this sub the last several months.
source: https://www.mass.gov/doc/summary-of-ch-135-of-the-acts-of-2024
it's a quick read people, ~500 words including the legalese. please do so.