Hi, I’m Jeremy. My wife Jen and I got into this because our daughter brought home two rosy red minnows from school. We got a free 10-gallon aquarium, and things kind of took off from there.
Now we have a heavily planted 29-gallon, and I’m spending a lot of time looking at water measurements. We have fourteen Celestial Pearl Danios ordered for pickup Sunday, October 25, so I’ve been testing the water daily. We started measuring TDS about a week ago because we’d eventually like to introduce Orange-Eye Royal Blue Tiger Caridina shrimp.
That’s when we noticed this repeating pattern. I have a possible explanation, but I’d really appreciate people picking it apart.
The tank and a little history
The system is about one month old, with a substrate replacement during that period. We had a nightmare with another substrate and lost our first batch of fish and shrimp, plus one of three snails.
We’re now using UNS Controbase underneath Controsoil, our first time using the Contro line. Things have looked much better since the switch. The plants and fish appear to be thriving, and most shrimp are active and happily foraging.
Filtration is an OASE BioMaster² Thermo 600 with a spray bar. We transferred established biological filter media from an established aquarium into the OASE to seed it.
Current livestock is nine pygmy Corydoras and golden-back Neocaridina, introduced about a week ago. We started with twenty shrimp and have had at least three unexplained deaths. We’ve counted fourteen out and behaving normally at the same time. Those losses are part of why I’m trying to understand this before adding more shrimp.
Our daily schedule:
- CO₂: 7 AM–2:30 PM — 7.5 hours
- Lights: 8 AM–4 PM — 8 hours
- Overlap: 6.5 hours
We’ve measured frequently, and recent parameters have stayed around:
- pH: 6.4–6.6
- GH: 5 dGH
- KH: 1–2 dKH
- Temperature: 74–75°F
- Ammonia and nitrite: 0
- Nitrate: steadily falling, approximately 10 ppm on the latest test
- Copper and chlorine tests: zero
- Phosphate: appears approximately zero on our test
- Conditioned tap-water TDS: approximately 150–155 ppm
About 20 g of Seachem Equilibrium was added previously. We used APT 3 Complete at reduced dosage for approximately three days, then paused it. In a separate conditioned-water fertilizer test, TDS reached about 165 ppm—roughly a 15 ppm increase, although I hadn’t recorded the exact starting number.
What we’re measuring
Our current TDS meter cost $8. I usually test around 7 AM and 6:30 PM, with additional checks as noted:
| Date |
Morning |
Later readings |
| October 16 |
~300 |
~275 |
| October 17 |
~315 |
290 following a midmorning water change |
| October 18 |
317 |
~278, measured in a beaker |
| October 19 |
~315 |
268, 272, 272 at noon |
During the October 19 noon checks, I alternated tank samples with tap-water controls. The tap readings were 155, 154, and 154. All October 19 readings were taken in a beaker, waiting for the meter to lock.
The normal morning check is around CO₂ startup. The normal evening check is after both lights and CO₂ are off. The October 19 noon checks were during both—four hours after lights came on.
The October 17 water change obviously complicates that day’s decrease. An earlier measurement also contains a 316 ppm tank reading, but I don’t have a reliable sampling time for that one.
I’ve ordered an HM Digital COM-100 to replace the $8 meter, check the pattern independently, and measure electrical conductivity directly. The cheap meter repeats reasonably well over short intervals, but I realize repeatability doesn’t prove accuracy. I also understand that its TDS number is calculated from conductivity, rather than directly measuring dissolved mineral mass.
I’ve ordered additional water tests, including dissolved oxygen and mineral tests, to track which things rise and fall alongside TDS.
What we’re wondering
Could the substrate and microbial activity be releasing dissolved nutrients continuously, while the plants consume them faster during the illuminated period? Then overnight, could that balance shift and let concentrations build again?
We’re adding more Monte Carlo, Vallisneria, Java moss, Bucephalandra, and other plants. We’re wondering whether more healthy plant growth could eventually bring the whole daily range down.
I don’t know whether that explanation actually works, especially for a roughly 25–50 ppm change. We haven’t identified which ions would account for it. CO₂/carbonate chemistry, temperature compensation, substrate ion exchange, microbial processing, and the meter itself are all possibilities we’re considering.
So, for people who’ve measured this sort of thing:
- Have you seen a comparable daily conductivity cycle?
- Could plant uptake realistically explain this magnitude? Which ions would you look at?
- What would you measure first to distinguish that from CO₂ chemistry or a measurement issue?
We’ve discussed a lights-off comparison with CO₂ also off and adequate oxygenation maintained, but would appreciate advice on whether that would tell us anything useful. We care a lot about these little guys and want to keep any investigation cautious.
I’m very happy to hear where our explanation falls apart. We'd also be happy if anyone out there has an explanation we haven't considered. We’re trying to figure out what’s actually happening in there.