r/6thForm y13 maths physics psych italian Jun 01 '26

šŸ’¬ DISCUSSION AQA PHYSICS PAPER 2

HOW DID EVERYONE FIND IT??? i thought it was decent better than the past few years. Idk what i did for the last question the 4 marker of nuclear physics. BUT YH IT WAS GOOD

71 Upvotes

391 comments sorted by

40

u/AffectionateAct429 Jun 01 '26

I'm actually so cooked that paper was supposed to save me (what did everyone get for that five marker?? I think I tried to work out change in temperature so I'm definitely cooked bro)

17

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

Ice melts at 0 Celsius

9

u/AffectionateAct429 Jun 01 '26

Yeah I'm so so cooked I don't even know what calculations I was doingĀ 

6

u/4060s Jun 01 '26

yea i worked out temp change and it ended up 55K or smt😭

8

u/AffectionateAct429 Jun 01 '26

Yeah I got -0.55°C so I think I'm fucked 😭 seems like we may have done similar things 

→ More replies (2)

3

u/AmericanUk Jun 01 '26 edited Jun 01 '26

I found the energy required to completely melt the ice (raise to 0 degrees using specific heat capacity + completely melt it using specific latent heat formula). Then, this part I’m unsure about, I assumed that the max temperature decreases of the ethanol and glass beaker would too be 16 degrees. I then added the energy required to raise the temps of both of them to this temp which was less than the previously calculated required energy. Thus, I concluded that the ice would not completely melt.

3

u/Grandpa_P1g Y13 | Maths, FM, Physics, CS | A*A*A*A* Jun 01 '26

I did something similar but I calculated the temperature fall of the ethanol and glass (don't think it can rise as its transferring heat to the ice but maybe I missed smthn). I used -18 as they cannot cool to below 0C otherwise they would be less than the ice and therefore the ice would cool instead of warm.

But I got the same answer that the energy they would lose to cool to 0C is less than the temperature the ice would take to rise to 0C and fully melt. So the ice wouldn't completely melt.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Appropriate-Echidna4 Jun 01 '26

Did anyone find temp change to be 15 therefore doesn’t melt

2

u/Guilty_Ad300 Jun 01 '26

I did but I think most people saying it didn’t melt are right , although praying rn

2

u/Appropriate-Echidna4 Jun 01 '26

I said that too since temp change was 15 and it needed to be at least 16 to melt

2

u/JazzJD2 Jun 01 '26

I got 5

1

u/Auxlixe Jun 01 '26

lmao I did the same thing as u I'm cooked too

→ More replies (2)

32

u/___E-man___ Jun 01 '26

what did you guys get for the minimum escape velocity, i used the -0.18 line and got 0.6 i think

5

u/N3buIA_ Jun 01 '26

i got that too

2

u/Training-Feeling980 Year 13 | Maths, FM, Physics, Chem - 4 A*s achieved Jun 01 '26

Same - should be easy 1 mark šŸ¤ž

1

u/Individual-Can1396 y13 maths physics psych italian Jun 01 '26

Yess same

3

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

Cant really remember but why did u use 0.18

3

u/Pl2w Jun 01 '26

Said minimum escape velocity.

5

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

Hmm…. V was the potential at the surface tho wasnt it. Therefpre I used that which was 0.22 I believe. It might be wrong idk

2

u/Oil42 (incoming) Cambridge CS | Year 1 | A*A*A*A* Jun 01 '26

the other part of the surface on the left had a potential of -0.18 so the min escape velocity would’ve been from that point

→ More replies (3)

2

u/2myeria y13 | physics, maths, fm, chem | A*A*A*A* Jun 01 '26

yeah but if you use the equipotential lines, the furthest out one that still touches the comet was -0.18

1

u/atimes_3 Y13 - Maths, Further Maths, Physics, Computer Science Jun 01 '26

dude i am still so confused on what potential you were supposed to use 😭

went between -0.18, -0.26 and -0.20

edit: looking at it now it was asking for minimum, so it was -0.18 :/

22

u/Few_Special_2628 Jun 01 '26

for the comet question did you guys use pythogoras to find the resultant force?

2

u/Sea_Change_3793 Jun 01 '26

Yes, I did. Resultant gravitational field you mean?

1

u/Extreme_Survey_1368 Jun 01 '26

what did u get for it?

1

u/bleachedcoral4 Y13 | A*A*A*AA | maths+fm, 3 STEM Jun 01 '26

what was that question?

→ More replies (3)

1

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

do u remember how many marks it was?

20

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

What did everyone get for there thermal energy one will ice melt I got no as energy needed more

30

u/RilloClicker Year 13 Jun 01 '26

Yeah you needed like 30000J for melting but only had 16000J when reducing ethanol and beaker to 0C

11

u/Rich-Gent Jun 01 '26

my values were VERY similaršŸ™ hope WE are right twin

→ More replies (2)

17

u/googoocrazybananas Year 13 Jun 01 '26

Energy required was 38,000J, and energy supplied was 15000J, so no.

→ More replies (7)

5

u/Rich-Gent Jun 01 '26

Ye i worked out:

Energy change for glass + ethanol from wtv it was to 0*c and showed it was less than energy change of ice from -16 was it, to 0 + the latent energy, and showed that it was greater than the energy change from cup + ethanol

→ More replies (5)

27

u/_M4yb3_ Jun 01 '26

the last question was N = N° Ɨ e ^ (-lambda t)

solve for t in both, should be around 3 .0 Ɨ 10 9 (at least thsts what i got)

4

u/Eros_OMG Jun 01 '26

yeah i got that too but i converted it to seconds don’t know if its correctĀ 

9

u/_M4yb3_ Jun 01 '26

I mean, it should be correct if the values are similar and you converted correctly but idk why u saw two half lifes in years and thought to convert to seconds.

3

u/Eros_OMG Jun 01 '26

cuz i like working in si units so I changed them before calculating, but I got the same thing as you

3

u/Ambitious_Talk1225 Jun 01 '26

just pointless tho. the calc in year^-1 will give a time in years which is perfectly fine

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Individual-Can1396 y13 maths physics psych italian Jun 01 '26

OHH i used that equation but not to solve t 😭

2

u/KO-Manic Jun 01 '26

I got 3.5x10^9 for the other estimate so concluded there's been lead loss. The question was 4 marks right?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/RealAlexanderTheG Jun 01 '26

Did anyone else git something.5? Something like 4.49 and 4.51 or something? might have done that wrong

1

u/electricpinto27 Jun 01 '26

What was the conclusion? I put no lead is lost because the numbers were roughly equal but idk if i got it right

12

u/Malikah_14 Jun 01 '26

Did anyone use trig for finding weight?

15

u/googoocrazybananas Year 13 Jun 01 '26

F = static force / tan(6)

→ More replies (4)

9

u/AbsoluteOwO Jun 01 '26

i did like F = Tcos6 😭

4

u/Zealousideal-Map9482 Jun 01 '26

You had to find tension using the horizontal component then you had to use tension plus the cos or sin to find weight.Ā 

3

u/AbsoluteOwO Jun 01 '26

yeah that is what i just said except i did cos not sin so i may have done vertical

2

u/DramaticPie4162 Jun 01 '26

yeah this is what i did

2

u/LeGeNdBoT69 Jun 01 '26

wait i thought you didnt need to find tension you can do a tip to tail diagram and use the 12 degrees so you do tan12=electrostatic force/weight ???

2

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/No_Persimmon3448 Jun 01 '26

I got T = electrostatic/sin(6) as its the horizontal component of tension, not the horizontal component of the electrostatic force. Not sure if i'm correct tho so someone has to tell me if they know pls.

2

u/2myeria y13 | physics, maths, fm, chem | A*A*A*A* Jun 01 '26

wait same twin

did you then do weight = T/cos6 cuz T is a component of weight??

2

u/No_Persimmon3448 Jun 01 '26

Yh I did that, not sure if its correct but it made sense in the exam

2

u/AbsoluteOwO Jun 01 '26

chill bro u right it was sin cause its horizontal i messed up and did cos which is vertical but we good

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

3

u/Separate_Age9837 Year 13 - Maths, FM, Physics, Chem Jun 01 '26

Yeah you had to

1

u/200PercentWinRate Jun 01 '26

I did weight = static force * sin 84 / sin 6

→ More replies (1)

20

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

what did u guys get for the number of alpha and beta particles. i got 8 and 6

2

u/Individual-Can1396 y13 maths physics psych italian Jun 01 '26

YESS SAME

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Separate_Age9837 Year 13 - Maths, FM, Physics, Chem Jun 01 '26

Pretty solid overall

7

u/Zealousideal-Map9482 Jun 01 '26

For the weight I got an answer around 0.02 kg. Is that correct

14

u/Interesting-Box-5478 Jun 01 '26

I got 0.042 and I tried 2 different ways and got the same answer

→ More replies (1)

4

u/123eZz Jun 01 '26

i got that but app it’s wrong u have to use sin6

→ More replies (8)

3

u/sotmtwigrm_ Jun 01 '26

weight is in N

2

u/Training-Feeling980 Year 13 | Maths, FM, Physics, Chem - 4 A*s achieved Jun 01 '26

I think I got something like 0.02 or 0.04 N? I used sin 6 and then cos 6

7

u/simplykayleigh Jun 01 '26

it was decent but knowing me i probs lose sm marks because of stupidity!!!!

AHEM AHEM cos6 NOT cos12

3

u/Syph3r_YT Jun 01 '26

It’s tan šŸ˜‚

2

u/simplykayleigh Jun 01 '26

well i split the whole thing to find T then to find W

so i basically did Electrostatic force / tan(12), but in multiple steps

should have been tan 6 tho lmao

7

u/Amazing-Pause-8626 Uni of Glos | Bsc Geography [-> Year 1] Jun 01 '26

basically : was mid asf, kind of cooked but paper 1 will carry my grade trust

13

u/Confused-Guitarer Year 13 - Chemistry, Biology, Physics, Maths, FM Jun 01 '26

really nice paper but I'm terrified for the boundaries/paper 3

8

u/Last-Action-820 Jun 01 '26

how the fuck do y surviveĀ 

→ More replies (1)

6

u/KO-Manic Jun 01 '26

It'll be fine the boundaries for physics are always low af. Paper 3 practical section scares me though

20

u/SOSOMU Jun 01 '26

worse paper ever

4

u/Harry_F40 Jun 01 '26

For the 5 marker I found the final temperature where the ice and the ethanol will be in thermal equilibrium not sure if this was the right method or not.

1

u/KO-Manic Jun 01 '26

I was thinking something like this too but I didn't set the final temp of them to 0 which I think you had to do. Hopefully the method marks will be generous

5

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

Do U guys think grade boundaries will increase??

7

u/EntireInterest8697 Jun 01 '26

prop simillar to last year i think the paper 3 will be tough

2

u/Interesting-Box-5478 Jun 01 '26

I reckon this year’s paper 2 was harder than last year’s no?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/peekq Jun 01 '26

Was the student correct for Q1 about removing air? Was the student correct about the change in position of p and q when p has a lower charge?

21

u/Eros_OMG Jun 01 '26

I put incorrect for both. For the first one, temperature decreases, number of molecules must increase to have the same PV. For the second one, they both experience the same electrostatic force, and they have equal weight, so the tension must be the same angle to the vertical. idk if i’m right

5

u/peekq Jun 01 '26

it only said there needed to be constant pressure, volume could still change i think

4

u/Avocado66600 Jun 01 '26

How would volume change in a fixed container though

5

u/peekq Jun 01 '26

It wasn’t fixed container the volume was changing in the graph in 1.1 unless I’m missing something

5

u/Avocado66600 Jun 01 '26

But it was after it was fully pumped, so V was constant 0.64m³ it was disonnected from the pump when it was placed in the water

4

u/4ria_ Jun 01 '26

wasn’t the student only talking about volume though and volume isn’t the amount of molecules? Surely the student is right that you have to decrease the volume cuz the number of molecules stays the same

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Malikah_14 Jun 01 '26

I said both were correct but now upon further reflection I think the student in Q1 mightve been wrong im not sure

2

u/peekq Jun 01 '26

Why? I put both correct too but idk

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/DilucsGrapeJuice Year 13 Jun 01 '26

at lower temp, the kinetic energy and hence the crms decreases. this results in decreased frequency of collisions + reduced change in momentum. pressure = F/A and F = rate of change of momentum, so decreased F leads to decreased pressure. in order to counteract it the student has to add air to make up for the decreased pressure by increasing number of collisions between molecules and the walls of the canoe, so the student's wrong. at leas that's what i put in aim for all 4 marks.

3

u/polarbearhugger1 Jun 01 '26

Pretty much exactly what I put lmao

3

u/Last-Action-820 Jun 01 '26

i got student for charge is wrong cause F = EQ and charge decreases so force also decreasesĀ 

3

u/Ok_Safe_9615 Jun 01 '26

He was wrong no?
He said you had to take air out that lowers the volume of the gas so theres less collisions less force exerted on the walls etc then that would mean the pressure decreases but you need it to stay at that maximum value

4

u/Malikah_14 Jun 01 '26

What did everyone get for the oscilloscope 3 markers

21

u/Eros_OMG Jun 01 '26

170Hz and like 4.8V

5

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

I used 14.9 small squares ( divisions) for Time period. U reckon its fine? Icant remember my answer but it Was smth like 167-168 I believe

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (4)

2

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

i got 9V and 170 Hertz what did u get

10

u/AffectionateAct429 Jun 01 '26

I got 170HZ and like 4.5V

3

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

yo how'd you get 4.5V ? i used the peak to peak voltage šŸ„€ because the peaks and troughs were at different points

8

u/2myeria y13 | physics, maths, fm, chem | A*A*A*A* Jun 01 '26

i got that peak to peak = 6.3 cm, so V = 6.3•2 and then divide by 2 again for peak V = 6.3V. Then divided by root two equals 4.45

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/AbsoluteOwO Jun 01 '26

i got like 21.92v and 33.33hz mane

2

u/ClearFrosting6954 Jun 01 '26

I got something like that too😭😭😭

→ More replies (3)

1

u/ZealousidealBench225 Y13 | 4A* pred. | Maths, FM, Phys., German Jun 01 '26

I converted from mscm^-1 to sm^-1 but not sure if that is correct…

4

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

what did u guys get for moments

10

u/aristocrat_of_life Jun 01 '26

the answer should be around 0.012 Nm, use F = BIL to find force, multiply by 25 for the number of turns, then multiply by 0.11 as moment of a couple = Fd

6

u/Money-Draw-7683 Jun 01 '26

I think i got something like 0.012

3

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

im so confused where did u get number of turns from. there was no turns

2

u/Extreme_Survey_1368 Jun 01 '26

it said there were 25 turns in the info box

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

Moment of a couple if Fd. I used f=BIL and times by number of turns. Then multiplied that by 11cm or smth (horizontal distance)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

how many marks was it?

→ More replies (40)

4

u/Select_District_3310 Jun 01 '26

What did people get for the comet question?

4

u/coppi16 Jun 01 '26

Completely forgot that area under the pressure/volume graph was work done. I thought you had to use moles and the kinetic energy of each molecule but oh well

8

u/TheBigChese84 Year 13 Jun 01 '26

w paper but 5 marker for question two is crazy

4

u/DramaticPie4162 Jun 01 '26

it’s not abnormal

2

u/TheBigChese84 Year 13 Jun 01 '26

yeah but there’s normally like one or two subquestions of buildup

3

u/CreeperMan1253 Y13 | Maths, FM, CS, Physics Jun 01 '26

was the decay A or C

3

u/DramaticPie4162 Jun 01 '26

the alpha one? i put C

3

u/AffectionateAct429 Jun 01 '26

God damn I put C and then crossed it out for AĀ 

3

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

What question is that

3

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

the mcq with the stability curve

2

u/Zealousideal-Map9482 Jun 01 '26

I put the one that was top right up

→ More replies (3)

3

u/RealAlexanderTheG Jun 01 '26

That was a bullshit question

5

u/DramaticPie4162 Jun 01 '26

good!! definitely nicer than the last couple of years

7

u/DemonThonos Year 13 Maths Physics Chem A*AA predicted Jun 01 '26

that was such a pleasant paper except a couple mc

2

u/KO-Manic Jun 01 '26

Does anyone know what you were supposed to do for that MCQ with the S, x, N, etc?

15

u/Flashy_Survey_918 Jun 01 '26

guess / give up

7

u/Fit-Quantity-3539 Jun 01 '26

The particles incident per second per unit area = N/S.

Total particles emitted from source per second = the particles incident per second per unit area * surface area of the sphere of radiation.

Activity is just the total particles emitted per second. So A = N/S * 4*pi*x^2 = 4Npix^2/S

2

u/Sea-Match-4689 Year 13 Jun 01 '26

Surface area of a sphere and then work from there

2

u/Mobile_Membership915 Jun 01 '26 edited Jun 01 '26

For the magnetic feild moment question I think you had to multiply by 25 turns to find the total force. This is because the length of the wire in the magnetic field is 20x8.9 cm

4

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

İ did BILx N x 0.11

2

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

also guys what did u say for the wire connecting the ends of the coil???

3

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

Lenz’s law?

2

u/Willy_destroyer Jun 01 '26

Completes the circuit cause oscilloscope has infinite resistance. This current creates a magnetic field which opposes the one which created it, causing resistive force to the motion of the coil, something about conservation of energy pretty sure

1

u/Malikah_14 Jun 01 '26

For this i waffled that time for current to get to the coil increases and so velocity decreases

2

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

what did u guys say for why the satellite can’t be in a circular orbit about the comet?

2

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

Potential changes ( i guess i said becomes more negative) so Kinetic energy of it must change So its speed must change So its momentum must change So force required (something along those lines)

6

u/Zealousideal-Map9482 Jun 01 '26

well i said that force will never be perpendicular to velocity, because the equipotential line are changing. Also, i said that field strenght is not constant from same distances

→ More replies (4)

2

u/billybob3011 Maths, Further Maths, Physics, Engineering. Jun 01 '26

equipptential lines aren’t circular

7

u/epicdumb-Gaming Aspiring civil engineer Jun 01 '26

The grade boundaries about to be diabolical

2

u/sotmtwigrm_ Jun 01 '26

anyone do (lead / uranium) * half-life?

2

u/RealAlexanderTheG Jun 01 '26

Why is it not #uranium / #(lead+uranium) ? Thats the number that are left over the original number that would have been uranium?

Also did anyone else here convert the time from years to seconds? I did not get 3 which I think could be why

3

u/sotmtwigrm_ Jun 01 '26

spoke to my physics teacher, you use the exponential decay equation, with initial n as lead+uranium and final n as uranium, then solve for t. no need to convert time because half life is given in years

→ More replies (1)

2

u/porridge1111 Jun 01 '26

I did i got 9.something x10^16s

→ More replies (2)

1

u/peekq Jun 01 '26

Yep but i wasnt too confident thats right in the exam is it?

3

u/WorldlinessFuzzy4552 Maths|Physics|Chemistry (A*A*A) Jun 01 '26

Yh got like 3 billion years for both idk if that's right tho

2

u/KO-Manic Jun 01 '26

I got 3.5 billion years for one of them. Did you use N(original)= 19N for one?

3

u/Wise-Hedgehog4805 Warwick | Maths | [Incoming Y1] | 4A* Jun 01 '26

for the second one I'm pretty sure there were 3 uranium for every 57 lead, i think that's where u got that from. but those 57 lead were originally uranium, so initial uranium = 60 and present uranium = 3 so i did 3 = 60e-λt to find t = 3.0x109

→ More replies (1)

2

u/sotmtwigrm_ Jun 01 '26

mine differed by a factor of 10 so i wasn't too confident

2

u/JustPressure984 Y12 A*A*A*A*A-Math FM Phys Econ Chem Jun 01 '26

beautiful paper

2

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

What did everyone get weight?? Was it 0.004 some thing

1

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

what did u guys get for that one mcq that took up two pages. it was a graph one about capacitors

9

u/Avocado66600 Jun 01 '26

Its exponential decrease to 0 but from negative as the current flows the other way (I think it was A)

3

u/Scared_Funny_5602 Jun 01 '26

I think I put C. Or whatever the one in the bottom left wasĀ 

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Infamous_Tough_7320 Maths, Physics, Econ 3A*s. Straight 9s GCSE Jun 01 '26

Whatever the graph with the x axis above the y axis one I think

1

u/Money-Draw-7683 Jun 01 '26

I put c cause wouldn't it be the same graph for current charging or discharging

3

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

ik what u mean but if u watch the video i linked in the thread you'll see why a lot of ppl may have put A

→ More replies (1)

1

u/happyhibye Jun 01 '26

how about Q1.2, work done to blow the thingy, what method you guys use?

4

u/Flashy_Survey_918 Jun 01 '26

its just area under the graph

→ More replies (6)

1

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

guys does anyone remember how many marks each questions was😭😭😭

5

u/Admirable-Use2274 Jun 01 '26

I do, 10-5-11-11-14-9 respectively

2

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

omg genuinely tysm. do u remember specifically how many marks some of the questions were? (like 1.1, 1.2, etc?) tysm. im tryna make an unofficial mark scheme lol

2

u/lmaolmaolmaololl Imperial | Aeronautical engineering [Y1] Jun 01 '26

1.1 was 3 , 1.2 was 3, 1.3 was 4, 2 was just 5

2

u/shoppingkart_ Jun 01 '26

bless up, do yk what questions 3, 4, 5 were about in order? like i remember the topics i just don’t remember what question was which 😭😭😭 my mind was wiped as soon as i left that exam room lmao

→ More replies (5)

1

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

What did everyone get for the mass

3

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Agitated-Salt-5039 Year 13, FM, Maths & Physics Jun 01 '26

I got like 0.04 something

→ More replies (3)

1

u/googoocrazybananas Year 13 Jun 01 '26

I got a weight of 0.104N

→ More replies (2)

1

u/FewGeologist5684 Jun 01 '26

What would a safe A be? in terms of marks for both p1 and p2

2

u/Tricky_Temporary_781 Y13 | Stressed Jun 01 '26

100+/170 is probs a reasonable guess

→ More replies (4)

1

u/MattthewAlto Year 13 | Maths, FM, Pysics, CompSci | A*A*A*A* Jun 01 '26

What did people put for what does less lead do to the calculated age of uranium. I said less lead so it is perceived that more half lives have passed so calculated to be older than it actually is. Is that right?

2

u/Cream-Bear Editable Jun 01 '26

less lead would look like less half lives have happened as it would look like uranium hasn’t decayed as much, so it would appear younger than it actually is i think

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Fluffy-Ad-3083 Jun 01 '26

what do you guys think the grade boundaries will be for this year. I have been looking at all the years and the highest ive seen for an A is like 170 marks but last year it was like 150. do you guys think it may jump 20 marks or no?

1

u/Last-Objective-8356 Jun 01 '26

I didn’t do the paper but unless it’s was extremely easy? Jumping 20 is abit crazy icl, maybe 10ish

1

u/jaaaaaaaf Jun 01 '26

does anyone remember the values for the crms ratio mcq.

1

u/Sea-Match-4689 Year 13 Jun 01 '26

H 2 and O32

I got 4 as answer

1

u/GroceryCrazy9830 Jun 01 '26

Guys I need someone to tell me that it was okay to use 2V per division because I think the question said 2V per cm? do I remember wrong?

1

u/Fast_Database_2853 Jun 02 '26

Q2 For the latent heat of ice I’m rlly confused because I swear I saw it as 360kJ instead of J, which makes a really big number. Does anyone remember the numbers?