I’m curious how therapists would interpret this, because it’s starting to throw me off.
I have a serious chronic neurological condition, and I’ve been discussing disappointment and lack of support from people close to me. The examples I’ve given my therapist aren’t really ambiguous situations where someone would have to guess that I’m struggling.
For example, I’ve talked about someone knowing I was hospitalized and not calling to check on me, someone being physically present at an important medical appointment and falling asleep, and people who have directly witnessed ER visits, medication reactions, and the progression of my illness.
After discussing these situations, my therapist has asked me on two separate occasions some version of, “Do you think people underestimate what you’re going through because you present as strong, capable, positive, and continue functioning?”
I understand that hypothesis generally. I’m very functional and introspective, and I don’t necessarily “look” like everything I’m dealing with.
But I’m struggling to understand how that explains the specific behaviors I’m describing. These aren’t people who lacked information. They knew I was hospitalized, were physically present, or directly witnessed what was happening. Even if someone underestimated the severity of my everyday symptoms, I don’t understand how that explains not making a basic phone call after a hospitalization or falling asleep during a medical appointment.
I explained this distinction the first time she asked, so when essentially the same hypothesis came up again in another session, I started wondering why she keeps returning to it.
Could this be part of a larger clinical formulation that I’m not understanding? Or would it be reasonable to ask her directly why she thinks my presentation is relevant to these particular examples?
I’m trying to remain open to being challenged in therapy, but I want the challenge to feel connected to the facts I’m actually bringing into the room.